Lenses suited to landscape photography.

Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Lenses suited to landscape photography.

Postby iscar on Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:16 pm

Hi,

what sort of lenses would a "pro" landscape photographer use? I tend to shot a lot of landscape and at the moment im still just rocking around with the kit lense, so yeah what sort of lenses are generally used for this application?

thankyou :D
iscar
Newbie
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 5:33 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby birddog114 on Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:19 pm

Nikon 12-24Dx or Sigma 12-24
Or Nikon 10.5Dx fisheye
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Killakoala on Mon Jan 31, 2005 9:02 pm

Hmmm, if i was going to do Ken Duncan type landscapes i'd think about a 28mm 2.8f.

For Panos i will seriously consider a 50mm 1.4f or the above.

But a 12-24mm would be almost essential as Birdy says......

Of course it all depends on what type of Landscapes you want to do. Is it mountains, valleys, open wild plains, deserts, forests, floodplanes, swamps, etc......
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby MattC on Mon Jan 31, 2005 9:25 pm

24/2.8 is apparently a good one for landscapes. I have not tried landscapes with this lens - yes I have got it - not my style of shooting.

Cheers

Matt.
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby iscar on Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:34 pm

Hm thanks for the info - and yeah your right Killakoala, guess it does depend on what type of landscape.

One question however (forgive me if im talking crap here, im learning everday :P), landscapes typically you want good depth of field right,so because of that you'd use typically small apertures? If so then say a 50mm 1.4 prime would be well, still good but you wouldnt really use it for its large aperture?

comments? :P
iscar
Newbie
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 5:33 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby MHD on Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:53 pm

17-55DX
17-35

Both lenses know for minimal distortion...

My best shots are landscapes (I'm not saying I am a pro) and my dream hiking kit would be:

12-24DX
+
17-55DX
+
70-200VR (some times you want to go in tight on a peak or feature)
+
tc17e (many landscapes have birds :) )
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby nodabs on Tue Feb 01, 2005 12:34 am

never seen a fish like the 10.5 used by a pro landscape dude but it would give some interesting views i know some sports guys that do lifestyle shots with a fish and they look cool especially the "athlete in environment" shots which are basically landscapes.

i think the core of a pro landscapers lenses would be the 17-55 and 12-24.

however i hate to say it but if i was a pro landscape photographer, as in that is where i earned my money i would have a 1Ds mkII and a probably 6x6 MF with a digital back there is no compensation for the MP and full frame in landscapes you can use ultrawides like the 12-24 on a croped frame but honestly it's not the same.

however i'm not a pro landscaper and never will be so for my forays into the area i will be using the 12-24 sigma(saving) and the 18-70 kit lense does me fine :)
User avatar
nodabs
Member
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:14 pm
Location: Melbourne, Glen Iris

Postby nodabs on Tue Feb 01, 2005 12:35 am

MHD wrote:17-55DX
17-35

Both lenses know for minimal distortion...

My best shots are landscapes (I'm not saying I am a pro) and my dream hiking kit would be:

12-24DX
+
17-55DX
+
70-200VR (some times you want to go in tight on a peak or feature)
+
tc17e (many landscapes have birds :) )


thats about the kit for a landscaper :)
User avatar
nodabs
Member
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:14 pm
Location: Melbourne, Glen Iris


Return to Absolute Beginners Questions