Warning - You may not like what you see!Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Warning - You may not like what you see!Extreme macro. Subject is approx. 3mm by 1mm.
First attempt. I have no idea what is the magnification. D70 + Ext. tube 25 + TC1.4X + reverse 50mm + SB800 Exposure: 1/500 at f8, Flash manual 1/16. ASA 400 Manual focus and handheld. 1. What you see thru viewfinder. 2. Picture at 100%. Cropped to fit 800 by 600. I am sorry if it cause any unpleasant ...
I have no idea what the heck it is, but it still looks creepy anyway!
Amazing macro given the thing's size... Wow... If the bug is only 3mm long, the DOF is incredibly short/narrow, must be tricky trying to get focus on the right "bit". Cheers, Mudder Aka Andrew
I like it, it's just the lack of DOF that's annoying about it... looking from the head to the abdomen is slightly confusing as the eye sees something completely detailed and in focus to something blurry and hard to interpret.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
yeocsa
Not bad. But whenever you do this sort of macro...you have to use f/22 or the smallest f/stop you've got. That's priority no 1. Great attempt and I know we are going to see some great macros from you....because not many people use a lens reversed. In fact, not many people even know about reversed lenses. Regards
Matt. K
Thanks.Thanks for the encouragement. I need to use an older lens that is easy to turn the apeture ring. I could see the subject at f8. The moment i try to stop down, i moved focus point and it is so dark thru the viewfinder that it is impossible to focus. I did try at f11 but could not get the focus. Maybe the solution would be to use a tripod.
cheers, Arthur
I am warned, i look, i like.
Sensational. It's a beautiful bug. I see you focussed on its eyes too, a job i would expect to be quite difficult with the lens reveresed process too. Is your second lens a 50mm? Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Great work Arthur. I would love to see the reversed lens in action - I have a couple of lenses from other cameras which would reverse nicely, and although my main lens lust thrust is currently the 105 macro (or 150 but it is a lot dearer), I would still be interested in the more arcane techniques.
Maybe a Melbourne meet with emphasis on some macro action (in addition to the reds of course - mudder, are you there mudder?) Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Re: Hi
Ahem - I use the Sigma 105 and like very much what it can do - but that aside your pics are great but had to chuckle when I saw your specs. Arthur, you must be an old film guy - 400ASA Chris Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
What about checking out the botanical gardens one weekend... Flowers, insects etc. Nicole
Web Site
Excellent shot of the whatyamacallit but considering it is handheld
Well done Yeocsa The cropped shot is much better because you have eliminated much of the DOF foreground problems Cheers and well done Graham
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|