Lens Choice

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Lens Choice

Postby barry on Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:00 pm

I am looking at buying one of the following to use as a general purpose lens for wedding and social functions.

17-35 f2.8 ED
DX 17-55 f2.8 ED

At this stage I am leaning towards the 17-55 as it is the more current design and I think it would be better suited to my D70??.

I used the 17-35 once about a year ago and found it to be slow to focus especially in low light situtaions?

Does anyone have experience with these two lens and which one would you choose.

Any comments would be welcome.
D700, 50 1.8, 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR, SB800 plus a lot of gadgets
User avatar
barry
Member
 
Posts: 475
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:25 am
Location: Emu Plains NSW

Postby PiroStitch on Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:06 pm

Consider looking for a 2nd hand 20-35mm f2.8 as well. Older build but still built like a tank. For those who have handled one or have one, it's a sweet lens and at less cost than the 17-35.

If you feel like you need that extra bit of reach that you can't get because you can't walk to the subject, then go the 17-55. I'd feel more inclined to go the 17-35 or 20-35 tho.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Lens Choice

Postby Oz_Beachside on Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:27 pm

barry wrote:I am looking at buying one of the following to use as a general purpose lens for wedding and social functions.

17-35 f2.8 ED
DX 17-55 f2.8 ED

At this stage I am leaning towards the 17-55 as it is the more current design and I think it would be better suited to my D70??.

I used the 17-35 once about a year ago and found it to be slow to focus especially in low light situtaions?

Does anyone have experience with these two lens and which one would you choose.

Any comments would be welcome.


Oh, looking at your signature, you have some great glass, why not get the big pappa, "The Beast" 28-70, I never looked back!
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby joey on Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:16 pm

28-70mm is also PRO grade lens. There are excellent reviews from reputable sources on this lens.

I think the range it covers on a DSLR with the crop factor 1.5x is a little odd. 42mm-105mm. I don't know, it's good to be used with current film cameras, or possible future FF DSLRs. I prefer the 17-35mm lens.

The obvious choice for many is 12-24mm DX, 28-70mm, 70-200mm VR. Three lenses for the money covers 12-200mm range.
Nikons: D200, N80. Nikkors: 20-35 f/2.8 AFD, 50mm f/1.4 AFD. Speedlights: SB800.
joey
Member
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Prospect, Adelaide

Postby joey on Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:26 pm

I am planning to have 17-35mm 50mm f/1.4 85mm f/1.8 (Sigma 100-300mm F/4 or 80-200mm)

3 gaps or 2 gaps (if 80-200mm) in standard range. I can live with this. :)
Nikons: D200, N80. Nikkors: 20-35 f/2.8 AFD, 50mm f/1.4 AFD. Speedlights: SB800.
joey
Member
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Prospect, Adelaide

Postby barry on Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:18 am

Thanks for comments guys.

Oz_Beachside, I was thinking that the 70mm end of the 24-70 maybe too long. With my shooting I tend to shoot with wider angles than maybe this lens offers.
D700, 50 1.8, 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR, SB800 plus a lot of gadgets
User avatar
barry
Member
 
Posts: 475
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:25 am
Location: Emu Plains NSW

Postby Alex on Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:31 am

Another vote for a 2nd hand 20-35 here. I have one and love it.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby methd on Tue Mar 20, 2007 4:29 pm

Can't be more happy with my 17-55 here :)
User avatar
methd
Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC.

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:04 pm

I haven't used the 17-55, but have had the 17-35 for about a year now and apart from about 2 months in the shop earlier this year (and yes, I missed it like an arm), it hasn't missed a beat - I actually find the focus speed quite good.

But, on a FF (film SLR) it is fantastic!

P
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.


Return to General Discussion