A picture from the cemetryModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A picture from the cemetryI went for a wonder around the local cemetry here is one pic I took
Its been cropped and auto levels in Photoshop. I dont know if I like it or not.Kinder like it having no head Bigger here http://matt4004.fotopic.net/p11444967.html Taken with the 50 1.8. Feedback appreicated MATT
We hang around cemetries coz you don’t have to get consent forms filled out Nice pic - shame about the head and vandalism but it does make it interesting Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Thanks for the replys,
I will have to watch the background, it was something I realy did not put much thought into. Here is another. bigger here http://images4.fotopic.net/?iid=ystezt& ... &nostamp=1 I missed the mother sign being sharp, that was what I was after . MATT
i like the 2nd image, better composition and tells a story.
with the 1st image, maybe if the statue was a silhuette with the sun setting behind, would make for a image with impact.
I like the second one as it tells a bit more of a story. Have you thought about making the first one black and white, and maybe adding a bit of grainyness?
I also agree with ajo43 in that the frame is a bit wonky. Jon
It's fun to play with depth of field. When I first got my 50mm1.8 I was shooting everything wide open as it was a luxury I didn't have before and I loved the boke.
In watching the same in other pictures (and going back through my own), I realize how easy it is to open way too wide and exaggerate the effect instead of making the effect more subtle. In any case, that's what I think about the second one. I really like it, but I think that blur should be done gentler as it distracts from the story as opposed to helping tell it...make sense? I think that the B&W on the second is nice because it exaggerates the pleasant highlight around the edges of the statue. Good job in catching this unique subject. That's a good eye.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|