Opinions of 17-55mm Nikon lens

A place for us to talk about Nikon related camera gear.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Opinions of 17-55mm Nikon lens

Postby imarine on Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:42 pm

Does anyone have this lens and would like to provide a review of it? Its on expensive side, but may be worth it as a very nice replacement of the kit 18-70 lens.
D70
18-70mm | 50mm | 35-70mm | 70-300mm ED
imarine
Newbie
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 9:03 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Nikkofan on Sat Apr 07, 2007 9:01 pm

I have had this lens now for quite a while and am extremely happy with it. It's versatile, gives lovely crisp images and is often the only lens I'll use during a shoot, despite my packing every other lens and the kitchen sink in my backpack! :roll:

IMHO, I can't recommend it highly enough - I've found it's worth every cent of the big bickies it costs.
Nikon D70, Nikon D200, Nikon F100, Nikon 18-70mm, Nikon 50mm, Nikon 17-55mm, Nikon 85mm, Nikon 24mm, Nikon 60mm, Nikon 105mm, Tamron 70-300, SB800, SB28, LSPJ
Nikkofan
Member
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 11:50 am
Location: Sydney's Beautiful South

Re: Opinions of 17-55mm Nikon lens

Postby Oz_Beachside on Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:27 pm

imarine wrote:Does anyone have this lens and would like to provide a review of it? Its on expensive side, but may be worth it as a very nice replacement of the kit 18-70 lens.


Maybe some people can comment on its performance, but it would help if you contextualise. Whats your primary application? People, sports, architecture, landscapes, sunsets, sunrise, general purpose, weddings/parties, indoor, outdoor, natural/flash light?

Mine is people, so I got the 28-70mm (also just in case Full Frame (FF, non-DX) size sensors come out the life of the lens).

But if I wanted general purpose, walk about, I'd love the 17-55.

But I think I'd stick with my plan of non-DX, might get the 17-35. Non of this helps you I guess... sorry, dont have it, cant give you a review.

One place that may have many comments is dpreview, or thom hogan. Oh, and Ken Rockwell ...
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby Geoff on Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:55 am

Our very own JordanP did a review on this very lens some time back.

Whilst the images aren't there anymore, his words are.

http://www.dslrusers.net/viewtopic.php?t=2961&highlight=1755
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby methd on Sun Apr 08, 2007 3:38 am

i shoot with the 17-55 for 90% of my shots... i love it for general purpose, landscape and walk around.

some of my pics are here:

http://lumens.smugmug.com/
User avatar
methd
Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC.

Postby anubis on Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:35 pm

Ive had it for over a year. It kills at f2.8.
Nikon D300, Nikkors 70-200 VR, 17-55, 50 1.4,18-200 VR etc
User avatar
anubis
Member
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:05 pm
Location: Rose Bay

Postby shutterbug on Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:45 pm

Great lens :wink:

GET IT :!:
User avatar
shutterbug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown

Postby jamesw on Wed May 02, 2007 11:22 pm

does anyone have any idea how well the (much cheaper) tamron 17-50 2.8 performs against the nikkor 17-55 2.8???
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby chrisk on Sat May 12, 2007 10:46 pm

james just some feedback; i bought the tammy and after 2 weeks i had to return it due to a focussing error. a recieved a new one and the lens cap did not clip on properly. i tried other lens caps same problem. i went to the store and they picked up a slightly warped lens barrel so i got a refund.

some quality control issues there, i will liekly end up getting the sigma 18-50mm. its sharper, a bit better built and has a bonus pseudo macro function to boot.
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby fishafotos on Sat May 12, 2007 11:06 pm

I just bought one a couple of days ago. It is sooo sharp, fast and acurate. I am loving it.

These are some shots with 100% crops to go with them - http://www.boostcruising.com/forums/ind ... 1281051566

I would strongly recommend it


Cheers

Harry
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.

http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
User avatar
fishafotos
Member
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80


Return to Nikon