Sigma 30mm/1.4

If you're a user of a Canon DSLR, then welcome. This is your home.

Moderators: gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Sigma 30mm/1.4

Postby DaveB on Thu May 24, 2007 12:26 pm

Does anyone here have this lens in the Canon (EF) mount? Do you love it or hate it?

Or does anyone know of a camera store in the Melbourne area that might have one on the shelf?
I'm considering a new lens (for use on 20D, 30D, and probably 40D bodies) and preferably would like to test its IR behaviour before investing.
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby Wocka on Thu May 24, 2007 3:28 pm

Dave,

I have this lens and love it, I use it all the time. Focus is fast and smooth.
Warwick
=======
Canon 40D : 350D
Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
User avatar
Wocka
Member
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:05 pm
Location: Northern Beaches

Postby DaveB on Sat May 26, 2007 8:03 pm

Wocka wrote:Focus is fast and smooth.

Are you sure? I toured some Melbourne camera stores today with an IR 20D body, and played two two copies of this lens. In both of them I'd have to describe the focus ring as feeling "rough". Not bad as such, but definitely nothing like the feel of the focus rings in Canon's "ring USM" lenses (such as the EF 17-40mm/4 lens I had with me).
While that wouldn't stop me using the lens, it's a slight disappointment.

While the lens doesn't suffer from any obvious IR flare problems, it does have a severe mis-focus issue in IR:
Image
Sigma 30mm/1.4 ("focussed" on the tree)

Image
EF 28-135mm IS
Last edited by DaveB on Sun May 27, 2007 12:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby big pix on Sat May 26, 2007 8:09 pm

Dave are the 2 images, the same ??...... or am I missing something
Last edited by big pix on Sat May 26, 2007 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby sirhc55 on Sat May 26, 2007 8:28 pm

big pix wrote:Dave are the 2 images look the same ??...... or am I missing something


I’m with you Bernie - the people are in exactly the same position in both pics :roll:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby DaveB on Sun May 27, 2007 12:44 am

Sorry, that's what I get for pushing the "Submit" button in a rush while being ushered out the door to go to dinner with friends!
I've fixed it now.
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby adam on Sun May 27, 2007 1:14 am

oh, a little disappointing about the misfocussing - does this mean that it must be callibrated, or focus adjusted somehow? Or does it mean that it can't be used?
---
Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash
Wish list: skill
User avatar
adam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:27 pm
Location: New Caledonia

Postby Oz_Beachside on Sun May 27, 2007 1:22 am

DaveB wrote:
Wocka wrote:Focus is fast and smooth.

Are you sure? I toured some Melbourne camera stores today with an IR 20D body, and played two two copies of this lens. In both of them I'd have to describe the focus ring as feeling "rough". Not bad as such, but definitely nothing like the feel of the focus rings in Canon's "ring USM" lenses (such as the EF 17-40mm/4 lens I had with me).
While that wouldn't stop me using the lens, it's a slight disappointment.

While the lens doesn't suffer from any obvious IR flare problems, it does have a severe mis-focus issue in IR:


Agree on the noisy focus ring, mine sounds like its full of sand, noisy and very dissappointing for a premium sigma lens, but I can deal with it since I'm not taking pics of sounds.

Dont know what is going on with your demo focus in IR... something very wrong there!
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby DaveB on Sun May 27, 2007 9:54 am

adam wrote:oh, a little disappointing about the misfocussing - does this mean that it must be callibrated, or focus adjusted somehow? Or does it mean that it can't be used?

I'm not sure yet. There some things I didn't notice at the time (with a store attendant hovering around to keep an eye on their lens) and I would really like to spend a couple of hours with this lens, my standard calibration lens, and a couple of bodies to be sure.

I *suspect* that it may require significant recalibration of the camera and thus other lenses would mis-behave, but I need to do more tests before I'm sure. Hopefully I'm wrong, as otherwise it's a nice lens.

The results are SO bad that I've got a horrible feeling I'm missing something obvious. Also I wanted to check a different copy of the lens (Sigma's QC is legendary) but most of the other stores I visited that had this lens didn't have it in a Canon mount.
A couple of my shots did come out OK, but I wasn't shooting wide-open at that point.

So the jury's still out...
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby DaveB on Sun May 27, 2007 10:44 am

Oz_Beachside wrote:Agree on the noisy focus ring, mine sounds like its full of sand

"grainy" is the adjective that came to my mind. Fine sand maybe... ;)
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic


Return to Canon Corral