How do I get my shots to look like this?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
How do I get my shots to look like this?Hi all,
Firstly, these aren't my photos. These photos are from the guy on http://www.hioctane.com.au The below photos were taken on a D70 with a 70-200mm VR lens, so not your average lens I've never been able to take this kinda photo with my kit lens, or the Tamron 70-300. Is it the lens that it making the photos so damn sharp and rich with colour? The brightness / contrast / sharpness etc etc is all absolutely awesome , and I wish I could do something like that now.... I'm just not sure whether it's settings, lens, or technique? I take all my photos in RAW and adjust in Capture, as does the guy that takes these photos. Cheers, Tommo.
Tommo,
What My thought is the 70-300 can produce some nice pics but not as the 70-200VR. They're quite tack shap, the number 1 pic tells you all. So save up your money and get that baby. Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Hi Tommo
The first one really is quite sharp. I like the colours, but the background is a bit distracting. He wouldn't make a living from going around taking photos at these events would he? http://www.hioctane.com.au/purchase/ Pricing is as follows: 8”x12” - $25 (slightly larger than A4 size) 12”x18” - $50 16”x24” - $80 20”x30” - $110
Hi Tommo,
you don't really want to take photos of an old Mazda do you when your avatar is an Exige do you? The good news for you is the shots were taken with a D70, though Birddy picked it correctly with a 70-200 or 80-200, not a 70-300. That doesnt mean you cant do it. The first shot was taken at 98mm at F5 1/100sec. The second two shots were also taken at F5 at 1/400 and 1/500 sec respectively, which means you can hand hold them. I would suggest a monopod if you are doing a bit with the 70-300 (I assume you have one by this thread) extended. The first shot is taken late afternoon, you can tell by the golden light and shadows. So to replicate that shot, first find an old Mazda with a Kmac bar on the front, 30 profile tyres and ill fitting bonnet. Park in a spot where it will be evenly lit without shadows, but most importantly harsh highlights. Wait till late in the afternoon (just checked, these were taken at 5.28pm) and shoot plenty, it's digital! A very useful tool when looking at a digital image is an exif viewer if the data is intact. That lets you know the shooting info of the photographer. I use two one from http://www.opanda.com and also viewexif. Both are good
Sorry, Thommo just read all the info above the photos rather than the heading and photos only. Everything still applies, just substitute Tamron 70-300 for Nikon 70-300. If you want to see how good that class of lens is just look at Killa's photos under white water rafting
Thanks for the advice guys - I kinda figured it was the high quality lens as well I should also try shooting in apature mode, I've noticed most people seem to shoot in this mode during the day, not sure why though??
Is a Tokina lens any good? I would like to pick up a cheap one before I go to NZ in March. Birddog114: I dream of owning a 70-200VR, but at this point, I can't justify spending that kinda cash on a lens, haha. Regards, Tommo.
Tommo... whilst the 70-200VR is certainly a superior lens I think you should be able to acheive pretty similar results with your lens as long as the light is adequate. The high contrast 'pop' this guy is getting will be via post processing or perhaps high contrast settings in-camera. You can do that as well.
Michael.
Ahhh cool - i've just tried playing around with Contrast in Photoshop, and raising it to +15 yeilds some quite good results - thanks for the tip
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|