Kodak filter improves low-light pix

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Kodak filter improves low-light pix

Postby the foto fanatic on Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:45 pm

A future photographic tool -

From The Age today:
http://www.theage.com.au/news/breaking- ... 39495.html
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby phillipb on Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:51 pm

Interesting stuff Trevor, this could potentially replace VR.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby jamesw on Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm

anyone here got a grasp of how sensors work?

will this solve or exacerbate high iso noise problemss???
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby the foto fanatic on Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:24 pm

jamesw wrote:
will this solve or exacerbate high iso noise problemss???


Good question.

I would think that there would be little point to the filter if there was still a significant noise issue, which of course, is the main bugbear with low-light photography ATM.

From reading the article it would appear that there is still some development work involved and there won't be anything to trial until next year.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby jamesw on Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:30 pm

cricketfan wrote:
jamesw wrote:
will this solve or exacerbate high iso noise problemss???


Good question.

I would think that there would be little point to the filter if there was still a significant noise issue, which of course, is the main bugbear with low-light photography ATM.

From reading the article it would appear that there is still some development work involved and there won't be anything to trial until next year.


it was my vague understanding that noise was caused by excess energy/heat through the sensor. like i said. very vague.
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby the foto fanatic on Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:36 am

jamesw wrote:it was my vague understanding that noise was caused by excess energy/heat through the sensor. like i said. very vague.


Not quite. The sensor always works the same way. When the ISO is increased, the camera's internals boost the output from the sensor.

Think of it like an amplifier playing music. The source is the same, but volume is increased by turning up the the amplifier - if you keep turning it up, you'll get to the stage where there is distortion.

When you increase the ISO of your camera, you are amplifying the signal that comes from the sensor, and if you keep increasing it you will eventually get distortion (noise).
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby jamesw on Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:15 am

cricketfan wrote:
jamesw wrote:it was my vague understanding that noise was caused by excess energy/heat through the sensor. like i said. very vague.


Not quite. The sensor always works the same way. When the ISO is increased, the camera's internals boost the output from the sensor.

Think of it like an amplifier playing music. The source is the same, but volume is increased by turning up the the amplifier - if you keep turning it up, you'll get to the stage where there is distortion.

When you increase the ISO of your camera, you are amplifying the signal that comes from the sensor, and if you keep increasing it you will eventually get distortion (noise).


with that broad theoretical boundry in mind, a filter that increases the quality/quantity of light the chip takes in should not increase noise, as it is increasing the input/source of light rather than the output.
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby the foto fanatic on Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:20 pm

Further info contained in this item at DP Review:

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0706/07061 ... ghsens.asp
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane


Return to General Discussion

cron