Timesnap #2: Prime Photoshoot - Bastille Day, July 14 2007

Details of events that may by of interest to members should be posted here. This way those who may be interested in attending can have a thread to cooordinate their activities at those events

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Timesnap #2: Prime Photoshoot - Bastille Day, July 14 2007

Postby gstark on Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:43 pm

Ok, here we go again.

Remember our Anzac Day Timesnap exercise? We're doing it again.

But differently.

First of all, the date is July 14, Bastille Day. It's a Saturday, so we should all be able to get out and make some images.

The timeslot, again, is going to be Midday, Sydney time, unless enough of you agitate to make it midday, Paris time, which would be ... 10pm?

Where this is going to be different from the Anzac Day Timesnap though is in your shooting restrictions: This is to be a 50mm prime photoshoot. So, your zoom lens is out!

Only images shot with a prime lens, within the range of 45mm - 58mm, will be permissable optics to be used for this event. I don't see this as being an especially harsh requirement, as you can buy a 50 f/1.8 for under $150.

So, in a nutshell, Bastille Day, July 14, around Midday, and arm yourself with your 50mm (or thereabouts) prime lens.

Please express your interest within this thread.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Oz_Beachside on Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:54 pm

can you expand the range of the prime from 9mm to 86mm? I dont have a 50mm...

Or perhaps limit to primes?
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby ATJ on Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:56 pm

Gary,

Any chance of extending this to 60mm? I would like to participate but can't really justify spending $156 on a new lens just for this.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby Oz_Beachside on Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:57 pm

oh, I do have a 30mm.
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby gstark on Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:01 pm

Oz_Beachside wrote:can you expand the range of the prime from 9mm to 86mm? I dont have a 50mm...


:)

We've considered this carefully; no.

We're going to be extending the concept to other primes later, but as mentioned already, a 50mm (a) isn't exactly going to be an expensive purchase) and (b) is something that I think (and I'm sure many will agree) should be in everybody's kit.


And don't forget that most of us know other people here, many of whom might have the prime that we need. If this encourages y'all to get together for the shoot and a bit of socialising and lens swapping ... so be it. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby gstark on Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:04 pm

ATJ wrote:Gary,

Any chance of extending this to 60mm? I would like to participate but can't really justify spending $156 on a new lens just for this.


Andrew, if it's the 60mm macro, no. We've already considered that, and while it's a great lens and just outside of our specified parameters, that is actually by design, hence to 58 upper limit. :)

If it's not the macro, probably still "no" - see my response to Bruce - but please tell me more anyway.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Oz_Beachside on Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:08 pm

:roll:
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:11 pm

Gary, you may want to specify that the prime lens focal length is actual length, not effective length (given camera crop factors).
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby Laurie on Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:13 pm

I'm in
50mm in tow
wish it was later at night as my GF is dancing the Can Can for Bastille day at the Padstow town hall again.
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby Oz_Beachside on Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:18 pm

I'm glad its not a 200mm f2 prime timesnap :D
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby gstark on Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:19 pm

Reschsmooth wrote:Gary, you may want to specify that the prime lens focal length is actual length, not effective length (given camera crop factors).


Good point, Patrick.

Yes, it's actual focal length. So, a 50 f/1.8 will work, but a 30mm f/whatever with a 1.5 crop factor (45mm) is out.

And as a thought ... you might also want to, if you don't have a qualifying lens, consider lookig around at markets and other pre-owned venues. There are bargains around ...

Laurie, tell me more: for a French themed subject, we may be prepared to relax the timing ... :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:20 pm

Oz_Beachside wrote:I'm glad its not a 200mm f2 prime timesnap :D


Don't give Gary too many ideas for future timesnaps. Actually, I could imagine Gary throwing in a "hyperfocal distance" timesnap! :lol:

Oh, interest expressed.
Last edited by Reschsmooth on Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby BT*ist on Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:24 pm

14th July, 50mm prime. Interest duly expressed :D
Pentax istDS+K10D. Pentax 50mm f1.4, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 90mm f2.8 macro, Kit Lenses. http://www.redbubble.com/people/berndt2
User avatar
BT*ist
Senior Member
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:38 am
Location: London, United Kingdom

Postby gstark on Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:25 pm

Reschsmooth wrote: "hyperfocal distance" timesnap! :lol:



Hmmmm .... :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Glen on Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:28 pm

This will be good, I am in
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:44 pm

gstark wrote:
Reschsmooth wrote: "hyperfocal distance" timesnap! :lol:



Hmmmm .... :)


Bollocks to that :roll: It would take three hundred pages explaining it :)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Oz_Beachside on Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:53 pm

I can see the price of used 50mm lenses in eastern australia skyrocketing!!!
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby macka on Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:03 pm

Interest expressed.

8)
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby dviv on Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:10 pm

I know you said no zooms but what about a 17-50 set to 50mm? - It will be exactly 50mm 8) :lol:
User avatar
dviv
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1085
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:50 am
Location: North Shore, Sydney

Postby macka on Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:12 pm

Yes, can you explain why the condition is primes and not just 50mm focal length?
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby MCWB on Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:24 pm

Indeed. Not that I find 50mm a particularly useful focal length for the majority of my shooting anyway, but if I want or need to shoot wide open I much prefer my 17-55 f/2.8 DX over my 45mm f/2.8 P...

Oh and I bags Toccata and Fugue in D minor, BWV 565. 8)
Last edited by MCWB on Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby methd on Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:25 pm

sounds great but there's no chance i'm going to buy a 50mm prime just for this :shock:
User avatar
methd
Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC.

Postby gstark on Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:28 pm

Shooting with a zoom is not the same as shooting with a prime.

Compositional elements need to be more carefully considered; things like perspective, angle of view, etc all are treated differently (or should be) when you're shooting with a prime.

We want this to be a bit a of a challenge, and thus we want you to get into a prime lens mindset, hence this requirement.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby gstark on Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:31 pm

MCWB wrote:I much prefer my 17-55 f/2.8 DX over my 45mm f/2.8 P...


You'll note that the pancake is specifically included. ;)

But Toccata and Fugue, regardless of the key, should probably be in the Challenge thread. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby phillipb on Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:35 pm

I haven't really used my 50 1.4 since I bought it so what the heck, I'm in.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby gstark on Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:40 pm

Oh, did I forget to mention that because this is close to the AW, we're going to be awarding a prize, for presentation at the AW Dinner?

I'll probably get Poon to choose what he thinks is the best image.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:59 pm

gstark wrote:Oh, did I forget to mention that because this is close to the AW, we're going to be awarding a prize, for presentation at the AW Dinner?


No, you didn't. :wink:
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby MCWB on Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:59 pm

gstark wrote:But Toccata and Fugue, regardless of the key, should probably be in the Challenge thread. :)

:lol: :lol: Indeed, whoops. :)
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby big pix on Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:58 pm

I am in ......... but only just, I will have to dust off my 55mm manual Micro-Nikkor.....
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby Matt. K on Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:03 pm

There are photographers here who don't own a 50mm prime lens? :shock: :shock: :shock:
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby firsty on Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:29 pm

I have a 50mm prime... so I'm in :)
User avatar
firsty
Senior Member
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:34 am
Location: Baulkham Hills Sydney - D200

Postby Frankenstein on Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:41 pm

Matt. K wrote:There are photographers here who don't own a 50mm prime lens? :shock: :shock: :shock:

One here. Haven't used a prime lens in 30 years.

Frank
My photo gallery: http://www.frankalvaro.net
>>>> Nikon D300...Nikon 18-200 VR...Sigma 10-20...Tamron 90mm macro <<<<
"I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about. " Peter Griffin
User avatar
Frankenstein
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: Ruse (Sydney)

Postby Oz_Beachside on Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:41 pm

Matt. K wrote:There are photographers here who don't own a 50mm prime lens? :shock: :shock: :shock:


Happily!!!

traded my "50mm too tight" for the sigma 30mm 1.4.

Gary, if I set a zoom to 50mm, how is the challenge not the same? I still zoom with my feet. Shirley?
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby macka on Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:46 pm

I've got the 50 1.8 but admittedly hardly ever use it.
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby Oscar on Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:56 pm

gstark wrote:We've considered this carefully; no.


Does this mean "I'll think about it. I've thought about it, NO! or is it just plain no? :lol:

Hmmmm. I have a 50mm so I guess it doesn't matter - I'm in.

Cheers, Mick :) :) :) :)
User avatar
Oscar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Panania, Sydney

Postby christiand on Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:03 pm

Hi everyone,

is there a difference in angle, perspective, compression, depression, distortion and whatever I haven't thought of between a prime 50mm lens and whatever zoom set at 50mm - not talking f1.2 or f1.4 or f1.8 available for 50mm prime or weight and size of lense.?

Regards,
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby dawesy on Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:07 pm

I shall be in. Is macro out? Just wondering if I should have both 50s handy in case a detail shot presents itself.
dawesy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Roseville, Sydney

Postby gstark on Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:14 pm

Matt,

Matt. K wrote:There are photographers here who don't own a 50mm prime lens? :shock: :shock: :shock:


I know, sad, isn't it.

It's not as if this is a luxury lens; each of the majors' prime 50s are exceptional glass, and exceptional value for money.

While zooms offer flexibility and a number of other benefits, there is nothing like a prime.

With apologies to Richard and Oscar. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby gstark on Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:15 pm

Oscar wrote:
gstark wrote:We've considered this carefully; no.


Does this mean "I'll think about it. I've thought about it, NO! or is it just plain no? :lol:


It means that we asked the question, and answered it, before we posted the announcement.

And that's still a no. :) :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:17 pm

I have a 50mm so I will take a pic - If I did not have a 50mm lens then I would not take a pic - simple 8)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby methd on Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:18 pm

christiand wrote:Hi everyone,

is there a difference in angle, perspective, compression, depression, distortion and whatever I haven't thought of between a prime 50mm lens and whatever zoom set at 50mm - not talking f1.2 or f1.4 or f1.8 available for 50mm prime or weight and size of lense.?

Regards,
CD


The extra backward logic comes with the fact that the conditions state that various primes can be used at different focal lengths (45-58 )... which makes it more versatile than a zoom set at 50mm would. So people who own many primes within the stated focal lengths will have an advantage as they can effectively shoot at whatever focal length they like, but with their prime lens.
Last edited by methd on Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
methd
Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC.

Postby christiand on Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:19 pm

Hi Gary,

sorry to ask the question again in some other way but what is the difference in a zoom lens locked at 50mm compared to a prime 50mm ?
I also assume that EXIF data would show what focal length pictures have been taken with.
Can you please help me getting the point ?

Cheers,
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby gstark on Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:21 pm

dawesy wrote:I shall be in. Is macro out? Just wondering if I should have both 50s handy in case a detail shot presents itself.


Macro is why we've excluded the 60. :)

Most of the macros within the focal ranges we're allowing are older glass, and thus require a bit more work from the photographer, so we're comfy with that. We have a pancake, 50 f/1.4 and a very old 55 micro, from my FTn.

Bottom line is that if you have a macro prime within the permitted range, no problemo.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby gstark on Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:32 pm

methd wrote:The extra backward logic comes with the fact that the conditions state that various primes can be used at different focal lengths (45-58 )... which makes it more versatile than a zoom set at 50mm would. So people who own many primes within the stated focal lengths will have an advantage as they can effectively shoot at whatever focal length they like, but with their prime lens.


Er, no.

You can still only submit one image. The three lenses I mentioned are owned between Leigh and myself, and he'll no doubt be shooting what he wants, with his lens.

As you don't have a prime, and you state no intention to get one for this event (and that is fair enough), it's difficult - and it will be difficult - for you to appreciate the subtleties involved in shooting with a fixed focal length.

That's why this is going to be a form of "challenge". If you're not stretching your photography skills and experience - if we're not helping you to do that - then you're the one losing out on the experience, the fuun, the learning ...
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby gstark on Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:34 pm

christiand wrote:Hi Gary,

sorry to ask the question again in some other way but what is the difference in a zoom lens locked at 50mm compared to a prime 50mm ?
I also assume that EXIF data would show what focal length pictures have been taken with.
Can you please help me getting the point ?

Cheers,
CD


It's basically a different discipline, a different mindset. You need to look at your photographic opportunities differently, because you no longer have the flexibility that a zoom offers you.

And ... I defy anyone here to put a zoom on their camera, and not adjust the focal length.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby christiand on Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:59 pm

Thanks Gary,

who do you really trust ? :lol: :shock: :o :( :) :?

hahahahahah ...

Regards,
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby the foto fanatic on Tue Jun 19, 2007 9:03 pm

christiand wrote:Hi everyone,

is there a difference in angle, perspective, compression, depression, distortion and whatever I haven't thought of between a prime 50mm lens and whatever zoom set at 50mm - not talking f1.2 or f1.4 or f1.8 available for 50mm prime or weight and size of lense.?

Regards,
CD


No
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby Paul on Tue Jun 19, 2007 9:03 pm

Okay I'm in even though I'll be in the UK on this date,
Should be an interesting shot considering it will be 3am on a Saturday morning..
So be prepared as it might be an empty beer/wine bottle! :P
Nikon F80D, FM2n
RRS BH-55, 055XPROB
Smugmug
User avatar
Paul
Senior Member
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:32 am
Location: Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia

Postby Marvin on Tue Jun 19, 2007 9:05 pm

I'm in! Could be interesting as I may be playing netball at that time!!
Nikon D7000
User avatar
Marvin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Back in the hot Riverland, SA.

Postby methd on Tue Jun 19, 2007 9:09 pm

gstark wrote:
methd wrote:The extra backward logic comes with the fact that the conditions state that various primes can be used at different focal lengths (45-58 )... which makes it more versatile than a zoom set at 50mm would. So people who own many primes within the stated focal lengths will have an advantage as they can effectively shoot at whatever focal length they like, but with their prime lens.


Er, no.

You can still only submit one image. The three lenses I mentioned are owned between Leigh and myself, and he'll no doubt be shooting what he wants, with his lens.

As you don't have a prime, and you state no intention to get one for this event (and that is fair enough), it's difficult - and it will be difficult - for you to appreciate the subtleties involved in shooting with a fixed focal length.

That's why this is going to be a form of "challenge". If you're not stretching your photography skills and experience - if we're not helping you to do that - then you're the one losing out on the experience, the fuun, the learning ...


Hi Gary,

I have a 10.5, 20, 28, and 85mm. I also *had* a 50, but the photography that I do does not require it so I sold it...
User avatar
methd
Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC.

Next

Return to Events