lenses for wedding

If you're a user of a Canon DSLR, then welcome. This is your home.

Moderators: gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

lenses for wedding

Postby zeddy on Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:42 pm

would like to know what lenses wedding photographer use on a 30D

thanks zsolt
Life is one-way street, and we are not coming back
canon
User avatar
zeddy
Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: milperra n.s.w

Postby Kyle on Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:46 pm

My choices would be:
24-70
10-22
50 1.4 or 1.2
70-200 2.8is
85 1.8 or 1.2

Maybe 3 from that list would be adequate

I'm doing one with a mk2n + 24-70 + 70-200 2.8 and a 50 1.4 :)
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby methd on Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:22 pm

I use mainly a 10.5, 17-55, 70-200, and sometimes an 85mm 1.8.

70% shots are taken with the 17-55, 20% with the 70-200 and 10% the rest when I have time to switch lenses.
User avatar
methd
Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC.

Postby mattyjacobs on Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:16 am

The last wedding I was at, the photographer used 2 lenses - the 70-200
(the really expensive white bodied lens), and a 24-70 f2.8L ... really expensive setup, but heaps of range, and minimal lens changing.

I'd hate to miss a good candid moment, or making the bridal party wait around for ages while I constantly change lenses.
User avatar
mattyjacobs
Member
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 2:54 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby shutterbug on Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:25 pm

It all depends on your style and what focal length you like. Do you prefer Zooms or Primes?

Cheers
vince
User avatar
shutterbug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown

Postby jdear on Fri Jul 06, 2007 2:23 pm

Im using 2x 30D's, 17-55 + 70-200. - getting some lovely images out of them.

Im saving for a 5D, then ill go with primes (85/1.8, 50/1.2...)

24-70+70-200 is good for FF bodies if you arent a prime fan.

Jonathan
User avatar
jdear
Senior Member
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Shellharbour, NSW

Postby Trieu on Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:24 pm

I have a 30D and the 24-70 lens lives on it. I think this is the go I reckon :)
Cheers,
Trieu
30D and TWO L's
User avatar
Trieu
Member
 
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: Sydney's West Canon 30D

Postby ozimax on Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:47 pm

A good friend of mine (Richard Muldoon from http://www.vividphotography.com.au) is an award winning wedding photographer. He swears by two lens, already mentioned in this thread, being the 24-70 F2.8 and the 70-200 F2.8 IS. Rich says he rarely uses flash indoors as these lenses are so good in low light.

Personally I have the 70-200 lens but not the 24-70 (yet!), but then again, I don't do many weddings.

Hope this helps your question.

Ozi.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby PiroStitch on Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:45 pm

I had the 24-105 f4 and a 70-200 f2.8 IS and dumped the 24-105 for a 24-70 f2.8. Haven't shot a wedding with the 24-70 yet but from other events, it's a sweet sweet lens in low light.

Nothing wrong with primes too btw. Another lens to consider is the 135 f2 or if you can really stretch the budget, 85 f1.2.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Grev on Tue Jul 10, 2007 8:16 am

I think the foot-zoom ability of the primes might make you miss some of the spontaneous shots.

Those 24-70s and 70-200s are spot on and amazing.
Blog: http://grevgrev.blogspot.com
Deviantart: http://grebbin.deviantart.com

Nikon: D700 / D70 / AiS 28mm f2 / AiS 35mm f1.4 / AiS 50mm f1.2 / AiS 180mm f2.8 ED / AFD 85mm f1.4 / Sigma 50mm f1.4 / Sigma 24-70 f2.8 macro / Mamiya 80mm f1.9 x2 /Mamiya 120mm f4 macro
User avatar
Grev
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:10 pm
Location: 4109, Brisbane.

Postby philcoop on Tue Jul 10, 2007 8:21 am

just wondering if anyone would know if its ok to use a 50mm 1.8 for a wedding, also would i need to use a flashgun, any help would be appreciated.

thanks

Phil
philcoop
Newbie
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 10:44 pm
Location: newcastle

Postby jdear on Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:21 am

just wondering if anyone would know if its ok to use a 50mm 1.8 for a wedding


its certainly ok!
I use my $100 50/1.8 and if you get the focus right it creates some lovely DOF. Some of my favourite bride shots have been taken with it.

Jonathan
User avatar
jdear
Senior Member
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Shellharbour, NSW

Postby shutterbug on Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:56 am

My fav wedding lens is the 50mm.

At the end of the day it depends on your style !
User avatar
shutterbug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown

Postby zeddy on Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:13 pm

thanks everyone for you help,at this stage i am leaning towards the 24-70 2.8 just need to save for it

zsolt
Life is one-way street, and we are not coming back
canon
User avatar
zeddy
Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: milperra n.s.w

Postby PiroStitch on Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:50 pm

zeddy - have a look at 2nd hand ones as well as they all tend to be in damn good condition
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby young_einstein on Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:07 am

For anyone using an APS-C body, a 17-55 + 70-200 is a pretty difficult 2 lens combo to beat!
young_einstein
Member
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:17 pm
Location: Caroline Springs, Melbourne

Postby methd on Sat Jul 14, 2007 2:24 am

young_einstein wrote:For anyone using an APS-C body, a 17-55 + 70-200 is a pretty difficult 2 lens combo to beat!


:lol: :D
User avatar
methd
Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC.

Postby young_einstein on Sun Jul 15, 2007 12:27 am

What's so funny? :p
young_einstein
Member
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:17 pm
Location: Caroline Springs, Melbourne


Return to Canon Corral