It's been a while..

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

It's been a while..

Postby Kris on Tue Feb 08, 2005 7:35 am

But I thought I'd post 2 photos I took recently... For some reason they appear to lack sharpness & color depth and I'm not sure why :(

I'm still using the kit lens and to be honest I've hardly taken any photos (still a newbie so im not helping myself I know!)

Any reasons why??

Here are the pictures in question

Image

Image
User avatar
Kris
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:31 am
Location: East, Sydney

Postby Killakoala on Tue Feb 08, 2005 8:13 am

Kris, nice to see you back mate.

The colour depth looks fine on my monitor, the sharpness could be easily rectified by Unsharp mask in either Photoshop or Paintshop pro, but you probably already know that....... Otherwise it could be the F-stop you have used. F8 to F11 is the sweet spot for most things with the kit lens so perhaps it was that. Otherwise i'm not sure what you mean as the sharpness you have is indicative of the kit lens.

Looking at the pics again, i really see nothing wrong with them.

What specific aspect lacks sharpness and colour depth.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby birddog114 on Tue Feb 08, 2005 8:15 am

Kris,
I believe the second pic is the pool of a hotel in Terrigal, am I correct?
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby JordanP on Tue Feb 08, 2005 8:18 am

Kris,

I'm with Killa on this, I can't see any major issues with colour or sharpness. If you wanted to give both images a bit more punch (so to speak) you could up the contrast a bit. While it might blow out a couple of highlights the overall image might end up stronger.

Welcome back!
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby dooda on Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:07 am

They both look like -.5 exp comp, I'd lighten them a little. The first one looks like it's been cropped or something, I agree the sharpness lacks a little. The 2nd one is allright, I think it needs a little light in curves or levels.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby Glen on Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:24 am

Hi Kris, good to hear from you again. Like the others I think they are ok, play in capture with them to get the result you want
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Kris on Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:51 pm

Hmm.. I don't do PP but I will use the unsharp mask and see how they come out..

No cropping at all, just a resize to 1024 in Photoshop. I'll have to check what F stop I used. Lens definately isn't as sharp wide open thats for sure.

Birddog, you are totally correct :) and what a nice pool it was...

exp comp was set to 0

Might play with sharpness and contrast in Photoshop and see what results I can get..

F8 to F11 is the sweet spot, going as low as F8 is no trouble in low light with the flash on? any recommended settings for this kind of shooting? it was a very low light hall and alot came out blurry, I guess my shutter speed was too slow because the F stop was too high? I'm such a noob :)

Hello to everyone again!!
User avatar
Kris
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:31 am
Location: East, Sydney

Postby lukeo on Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:10 pm

Unsharp mask settings...

100% - 200%
0.5 Pixel Radius
lukeo
Member
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Kensington, WA


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques