It's been a while..Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
It's been a while..But I thought I'd post 2 photos I took recently... For some reason they appear to lack sharpness & color depth and I'm not sure why
I'm still using the kit lens and to be honest I've hardly taken any photos (still a newbie so im not helping myself I know!) Any reasons why?? Here are the pictures in question
Kris, nice to see you back mate.
The colour depth looks fine on my monitor, the sharpness could be easily rectified by Unsharp mask in either Photoshop or Paintshop pro, but you probably already know that....... Otherwise it could be the F-stop you have used. F8 to F11 is the sweet spot for most things with the kit lens so perhaps it was that. Otherwise i'm not sure what you mean as the sharpness you have is indicative of the kit lens. Looking at the pics again, i really see nothing wrong with them. What specific aspect lacks sharpness and colour depth. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Kris,
I believe the second pic is the pool of a hotel in Terrigal, am I correct? Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Kris,
I'm with Killa on this, I can't see any major issues with colour or sharpness. If you wanted to give both images a bit more punch (so to speak) you could up the contrast a bit. While it might blow out a couple of highlights the overall image might end up stronger. Welcome back! Craig
They both look like -.5 exp comp, I'd lighten them a little. The first one looks like it's been cropped or something, I agree the sharpness lacks a little. The 2nd one is allright, I think it needs a little light in curves or levels.
Hmm.. I don't do PP but I will use the unsharp mask and see how they come out..
No cropping at all, just a resize to 1024 in Photoshop. I'll have to check what F stop I used. Lens definately isn't as sharp wide open thats for sure. Birddog, you are totally correct and what a nice pool it was... exp comp was set to 0 Might play with sharpness and contrast in Photoshop and see what results I can get.. F8 to F11 is the sweet spot, going as low as F8 is no trouble in low light with the flash on? any recommended settings for this kind of shooting? it was a very low light hall and alot came out blurry, I guess my shutter speed was too slow because the F stop was too high? I'm such a noob Hello to everyone again!!
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|