D200 as backup for D2x

A place for us to talk about Nikon related camera gear.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

D200 as backup for D2x

Postby Smurph on Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:34 am

Been looking around for a body to act as backup/second body for the D2x.

So far the one that takes the cake is the D200 as it is basically a cut down version of the 2x.

Just wondering what people's opinions are on the D200 good and bad.

And no, I can't afford another D2x unfortunatley :(
User avatar
Smurph
Member
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:18 am
Location: Clarence Gardens, SA

Postby gstark on Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:53 am

Absobloodylutely.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby TonyH on Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:54 am

Great Camera.... just do it!! :D
All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
TonyH
Senior Member
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD Nikon D200 & D70

Postby robw25 on Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:58 am

smurph
i have a d200 as backup to my d2x and use them together at weddings, of course if one carks it i always have my trusty old d70

DO IT !

cheers rob
User avatar
robw25
Senior Member
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:31 pm
Location: whyalla south australia

Postby Hudo on Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:27 am

Hi,

If you can justify another D2Xs as a backup then great. We couldn't and the D200 is a perfect backup camera. We like to shoot using both cameras using different lens to save time and possible introduction of dust into the sensor due to lens changes.

I met a commercial photographer yesterday who shoots with 3 Nikon bodies and a 5D as a backup. Does not like changing lens as well was his main reason given. Also redundancy if a camera or CF card fails. Go for it!!!

Hudo
Hudo
Member
 
Posts: 431
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:18 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:29 am

Hudo wrote:I met a commercial photographer yesterday who shoots with 3 Nikon bodies and a 5D as a backup. Hudo


Do you know what lens is attached to his 5D ?
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Hudo on Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:39 am

Hi Craig,

Simple answer is no. From memory of the discussion and looking at the box as he was testing out the lens it was a f2.8 and L series (red ring around the end of the lens) and would have been a 28 ~70 or 17~50mm but I'm no Canon expert. He used the Canon mainly as a backup and take out P&S style camera (nice to have I guess) but also when shooting in Low Light. He felt the Nikon gave better colour reproduction.

That's what I can recall.......

Hudo
Hudo
Member
 
Posts: 431
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:18 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:44 am

Thanks Hudo, no need to apologise I was just a little interested in his slightly unusal setup, but if you've got the money you get the best of both worlds.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Hudo on Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:51 am

Hey Craig,

Yes Katie and I often contenplate (dream) about having a stake in both camps but once your made in the investment in one or the other system you are commited as a part timer.

Hudo
Hudo
Member
 
Posts: 431
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:18 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria


Return to Nikon