Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.
Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by adamj123 on Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:56 am
Well as you can probably tell by my relatively low post count i am quite new to these forums and digital photography in general. Anyways, i was lucky enough to recently obtain a Canon 70-200 f2.8 IS lens from Hong Kong, been loving it since.
However, about 10 mins ago as i was getting out of the car after taking some photos with a mate a i hear a smash on floor  I look down in utter dismay and shock and see that my new lens had rolled off the seat of my car into the gutter  . I quicky ran inside to check that nothing had smashed and IS was working properly and as far as i can tell everything seems ok.
What would be the best way to check that everything is running normal on the lens? I took some sample shots and they also look good however, im worried something may be wrong that i am not picking up...
Last edited by adamj123 on Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
-

adamj123
- Member
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:38 pm
- Location: St Kilda, Melbourne
by sirhc55 on Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:08 am
If the pics are OK, bits do not fall off when handling, no unwanted noises from the lens when focusing, etc - then I would say it is OK 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by adamj123 on Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:13 am
Yeah that all seems ok, are these things generally built to handle rough situations?
-

adamj123
- Member
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:38 pm
- Location: St Kilda, Melbourne
by sirhc55 on Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:25 am
A matter of luck really, so it must be your lucky night - buy a lottery ticket 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by wendellt on Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:36 am
that canon 70-200 IS is built to withstand punishment
best to post 100 crop of test image
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by adamj123 on Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:50 am
ok...here one i quickly took of my dog
1/60 at f4.0, ISO 400 ,153mm

-

adamj123
- Member
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:38 pm
- Location: St Kilda, Melbourne
by Glen on Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:15 am
Adam, your lens seems ok, good news. As you probably read in the FAQ, the image limit is 800 pixels on its largest size. Your image is 800 x 1200. Can you reduce it down? You can see already how it has made all the posts in this thread unreadable without scrolling. Thanks
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by wendellt on Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:21 am
its best to take your test image wit flash as you did at 135mm you would get some blur even with IS at 1/60
shoot at 135mm at 1/200 f5 whatever iso allows for correct exposure
take one with IS on and one with IS off
it looks fine to me
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by adamj123 on Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:26 am
Sorry about that  first time posting an image...
Ill get on to those tests shots tomorrow. Thanks for the help so far
-

adamj123
- Member
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:38 pm
- Location: St Kilda, Melbourne
by adamj123 on Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:11 am
Ok i took some more test shots as you suggested and here are the results (i know they are crappy photos  )
taken at 135mm @ f5, ISO 130 1/200
First off i just wanted to show you this...it was taken into the the sun with a lens cover on...is this just some unwanted glare?
Photo 1 - IS off
Photo 1 - IS on
Photo 2 - IS off
Photo 2 - IS on
http://www.propokerplace.com/2ISon.jpg
Thanks alot!
-

adamj123
- Member
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:38 pm
- Location: St Kilda, Melbourne
by wendellt on Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:18 pm
its all looking good
last two examples are probably better examples
optically everythign checks out unprocessed thats a sharp as these lenses get
now to further test it use is in either mode 1 or 2 in a situation where is would kick in like taking a shot outside while in a car or shaking the camera around
if anything would of been damaged the IS components would be the most fragile
if everything checks out i think its safe to assume your lens is fine
as a side note my nikon 70-200 dropped out of my open bag on my back directly onto concrete once and on several occassions i have dropped it from similar heights, the lens still worked fine, these things are designed and built well iknwo a person who got theres runned over with a motorbike and apart form a bent filter element the lens has been working fine
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Onyx on Wed Jul 25, 2007 6:31 pm
It's a fine lens Adam. That lens is Canon's flagship. It's designed to be smashed on the ground on a daily basis for years to come and still perform flawlessly. I place my official seal of guarantee that your lens is in no way broken. 
-

Onyx
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
- Location: westsyd.nsw.au
-
by adamj123 on Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:35 pm
Thanks everyone for your support  i feel a heap better now
-

adamj123
- Member
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:38 pm
- Location: St Kilda, Melbourne
Return to General Discussion
|