Lens for overseas travelModerator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Lens for overseas travelHey.
well im goin overseas for a year to study, im gonna be doing a lot of hiking and want to be able to take photos of the landscape and scenery. At the moment i have 17-70mm Sigma 2.8 50mm 1.8 Canon lens. I will also be doing alot of street photography. Would these lens be sufficient?, what others lenses should i look into? Thank you
Having travelled for nearlly 3months only last week I can tell you what I took and used alot.
Full frame 5D 16-35 (used this about 65% of the time) Fast low light lens, 35 F1.4L in my case. Your 50 1.8 would be good if you don't mind shots that are a bit longer. I used this lens only at night as I didn't want to carry a tripod/flash. I used this alot! 70-200 F2.8 IS, long zoom with a tele. Didn't use this too much and you could do without it if you want to travel light. When I did need it (sports games, portraits from a far) it was invaluable. In my opinion and if budget allows, take a wide angle such as your 17-70, a fast wide prime for night shots and a long zoom. This gives you great coverage, no need for tripods and flexibility during the day with your wide zoom (this doesn't need to be fast but your F2.8 will do wonders) Hope that helps 5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
In that case, add a 70-200 F4 to your arsenal if you dont mind the extra baggage and your set! if you're a bit richer, the f2.8 IS is nice and you'll get a bit more reach cause of the 30D's 1.6x multiper
5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
Hi,
I just returned from a trip to Germany. The two lenses I used were a 12-24mm and a 28-70mm. Most of the time I used the 28-70mm but sometimes that wasn't wide enough and the 12-24mm helped a lot. I had the 70-200mm plus tele converter with me, however I never used the long focus. HTH, CD
For the all-important kilos-to-usage tradeoff, I tend to sacrifice my back and travel with too many lenses. The wide zoom and a nice prime are must-haves. I personally find a lengthier telephoto to be quite useful (eg 70-300) for zooming in on buildings from hilltop or high-rise vantagepoints.
For landscape and scenery and street photography, you might have pretty good coverage with what you have. Pentax istDS+K10D. Pentax 50mm f1.4, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 90mm f2.8 macro, Kit Lenses. http://www.redbubble.com/people/berndt2
Wow - you have really mastered the art of time compression!!! Sorry - had to pick that one up! Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
LOL 5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
I lived for three years in Modesto, California, one weekend. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Excellent, thanks so much guys.
Now one more Question. i have about 300-400 to spend on a Tripod/head, what is something that is relatively small and lightweight that i could take with me? Not goin to be doing so much backpacking over there, so it doesnt have to be tiny! Thank you
Hi Aszental,
what would you like to use the tripod for ? Reason I'm asking is that allthough I've got two tripods, I hardly use them. My tripods (were $250 without decent head) are not allways of the sturdiness I need and I also found that in a number of situations, like indoors I can get away with placing the camera on some something. A sturdy, reliable, long lasting tripod, that can also take rough terrain with a great ball head will cost far more, I believe, than your budget that you have indicated. Also carrying a tripod around is not much fun. A believe that a little bean bag (heat pad) may help a lot. Just my 20 cents, CD
Youll use the 10-20 more than a 70-200 for your trip I'll bet my $
5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|