NASA's camera shopping list - Poon interested??

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

NASA's camera shopping list - Poon interested??

Postby Vodka on Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:41 pm

NASA's going camera shopping. I think we should refer them to Poon. :wink:
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=24939

Interesting short read.

Ben
D3 | D300
Vodka
Member
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:54 pm
Location: CBD, Sydney

Postby Killakoala on Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:57 pm

They are not giving anyone good lead time for this procurement. 3 weeks is a bit optimistic for their requirements I'd say.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby TonyH on Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:20 pm

How long before they put them up for sale on Ebay after they're done.

As long a there aren't any Moon Landings the lenses will be dust free.... :D
All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
TonyH
Senior Member
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD Nikon D200 & D70

Postby Vodka on Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:29 pm

Exactly! 28 D2XSs shouldn't be a problem for a large supplier/distributor, but how many of those will be "lubricated with Braycote lubricating grease which is approved for spaceflight" :D

Killakoala wrote:They are not giving anyone good lead time for this procurement. 3 weeks is a bit optimistic for their requirements I'd say.
D3 | D300
Vodka
Member
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:54 pm
Location: CBD, Sydney

Postby obzelite on Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:59 pm

TonyH wrote:As long a there aren't any Moon Landings the lenses will be dust free.... :D


its not the moon landing you need to worry about its the dust and wind at area 51
Simon
www.colberne.com.au
I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
User avatar
obzelite
Senior Member
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 2:47 am
Location: Willagee, WA - D90

Postby obzelite on Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:02 pm

Killakoala wrote:They are not giving anyone good lead time for this procurement. 3 weeks is a bit optimistic for their requirements I'd say.


i think its just a government requirement to put the tender out there when they know only nikon themselves will be able to supply them.
Simon
www.colberne.com.au
I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
User avatar
obzelite
Senior Member
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 2:47 am
Location: Willagee, WA - D90

Postby Killakoala on Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:23 pm

obzelite wrote:
Killakoala wrote:They are not giving anyone good lead time for this procurement. 3 weeks is a bit optimistic for their requirements I'd say.


i think its just a government requirement to put the tender out there when they know only nikon themselves will be able to supply them.


Ah yes, but going by Nikon's own ability at getting their own cameras to the market, it will be a tall order for even them :)

(I imagine they will push hard to get them suitable and up to spec as the marketing advantage would be too much to give up)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby moz on Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:12 am

Killakoala wrote:They are not giving anyone good lead time for this procurement. 3 weeks is a bit optimistic for their requirements I'd say.


No, it just means that they're restricting it to the supplier that they have already chosen. Standard technique for corrupt organisations trying to look honest.
http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
User avatar
moz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:50 pm
Location: Coburg, Melbun.

Postby digitor on Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:51 am

moz wrote:No, it just means that they're restricting it to the supplier that they have already chosen. Standard technique for corrupt organisations trying to look honest.


Definitely a conspiracy - why don't they give Canon a chance to build these D2XSs with the special lubricant? :lol:

Cheers
What's another word for "thesaurus"?
User avatar
digitor
Senior Member
 
Posts: 925
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:53 pm
Location: Tea Tree Gully, South Australia

Postby Yi-P on Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:00 am

Expect a shortage of lens and camera body supply within next few weeks. They might simply turn their manufacturing site in Japan into NASA custom build factory until everything is out and certified. :P

I guess NASA is willing to pay US$8,000 - 10,000 for a single body ;)
And everyone in the US wonders where their tax goes :lol:
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby ozimax on Wed Aug 08, 2007 6:17 pm

Yi-P wrote:And everyone in the US wonders where their tax goes :lol:


I live in NSW and I wonder where all that GST revenue goes to...? Certainly not on the Pac Hwy near Coffs... :evil: (Another B Double rolled in Coffs yesterday, but I'm getting off topic here).
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby Matt. K on Wed Aug 08, 2007 6:47 pm

These cameras will be given to pers who will not know which way the flashcard goes in. They'll be Googling DSLRUsers from space in order to work out what PASM means! :shock:
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Yi-P on Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:27 pm

Matt. K wrote:They'll be Googling DSLRUsers from space in order to work out what PASM means! :shock:


Google's server are only allowed to show "RTFM" from that query sent from space :lol:
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby DavidR on Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:59 am

out of interest, what the hell use are they goin to have for flash in space lol? id doubt a speedlight has a big enough guide no to light up the moon! :lol:
User avatar
DavidR
Member
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: Unley Adelaide

Postby Grev on Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:09 am

Why does NASA like Nikon so much?
Blog: http://grevgrev.blogspot.com
Deviantart: http://grebbin.deviantart.com

Nikon: D700 / D70 / AiS 28mm f2 / AiS 35mm f1.4 / AiS 50mm f1.2 / AiS 180mm f2.8 ED / AFD 85mm f1.4 / Sigma 50mm f1.4 / Sigma 24-70 f2.8 macro / Mamiya 80mm f1.9 x2 /Mamiya 120mm f4 macro
User avatar
Grev
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:10 pm
Location: 4109, Brisbane.

Postby norbs on Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:23 pm

Grev wrote:Why does NASA like Nikon so much?


Someone has too :D
norbs
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: -30.940579 144.421865

Postby Vodka on Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:47 pm

Going totally OT here... but I just did a bit of a search into that Braycote stuff.
http://www.2spi.com/catalog/vac/braycote-600EF.shtml

According to the above:
"Castrol Braycote® 600EF is designed to operate in the presence of fuels, oxidizers, and in applications of deep space vacuum. It is used in gears, ball and roller bearings, electrical contacts, and "O" rings. This grease is highly recommended for applications where temperature extremes and/or low vacuums are routine, such as cryogenic coolers, FLIR, laser optical systems, or hostile chemical environments."

Ben
D3 | D300
Vodka
Member
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:54 pm
Location: CBD, Sydney

Postby MarkW on Thu Aug 09, 2007 4:35 pm

Grev wrote:Why does NASA like Nikon so much?


Because Nikon have supported/supplied NASA since the early Gemini launches.

Want proof - look at the optical assemblies they use on some of their old footage,especially the big powered binocular range finders (not cameras).
User avatar
MarkW
Member
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 9:57 pm
Location: Dharruk - Western Sydney

Postby Grev on Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:56 am

MarkW wrote:
Grev wrote:Why does NASA like Nikon so much?


Because Nikon have supported/supplied NASA since the early Gemini launches.

Want proof - look at the optical assemblies they use on some of their old footage,especially the big powered binocular range finders (not cameras).

Hmmm surely Canon can lure them away... :lol: But thanks, was just wondering why NASA's people only have Nikons.
Blog: http://grevgrev.blogspot.com
Deviantart: http://grebbin.deviantart.com

Nikon: D700 / D70 / AiS 28mm f2 / AiS 35mm f1.4 / AiS 50mm f1.2 / AiS 180mm f2.8 ED / AFD 85mm f1.4 / Sigma 50mm f1.4 / Sigma 24-70 f2.8 macro / Mamiya 80mm f1.9 x2 /Mamiya 120mm f4 macro
User avatar
Grev
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:10 pm
Location: 4109, Brisbane.

Postby MattC on Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:20 pm

Grev wrote:Why does NASA like Nikon so much?


I suppose that it would be necessary to look at the history of Nippon Kōgaku pre - 1945 at the core of Japanese optical development and its emergence post war as the worlds premiere optics company... even surpassing the German companies from whom they gained so much knowledge in the 1930's.

Nikon has always been an optics company first and foremost. NASA has probably forged a strong relationship with Nikon for much of their optical requirements, not just DSLRs. Why jeopardise that?

Or to put it another way. Nikon is not a marketing company. Why pay 200% more for 70% of the product? NASA people are not idiots. :)

Cheers
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby Ivanerrol on Sun Aug 12, 2007 4:51 pm

Those 28 " one off" bodies are going to be very expensive.

If an expense oversight committee was questioning NASA on the expenditure price, then NASA would be able to point out the tender process taken to procure them.

Alternately, given the short tender time, I would judge that NASA has already ordered them, they have been manufactured and are maybe already in NASA's hands. Possibly someone in the ordering department forgot that these were supposed to be tendered and this process is "back ordered".
User avatar
Ivanerrol
Member
 
Posts: 286
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 1:40 pm
Location: Ivanhoe Melbourne Australia


Return to General Discussion