
Shot at 70mm, F4.5, 1/125s

What do you think, is it an issue?
Thank you!
Sigma 17-70 backfocus?Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Sigma 17-70 backfocus?Hey i just shot this and i was wondering if the experts can take a look at it
![]() Shot at 70mm, F4.5, 1/125s ![]() What do you think, is it an issue? Thank you!
Re: Sigma 17-70 backfocus?
They'll be back in .... about three months. Can you wait? ![]()
My personal belief is that 99.9999% of so-called back-focus issues come down to just one cause - operator error. Usually that translates to poor technique, which might mean a poor understanding of how the camera works, or how it might work in a given situation. Ferinstance, I took my bright shiny new 30D out for a play last night - first time - and I'm not at all happy with the results. Focus is soft. Colours aren't how I like 'em. Exposure is all over the shop. I was shooting my D200 by its side, and results from that camera make an interesting comparison - super sharp, colour is great, exposure is where I like it .... What's really interesting is that at first glance (chimping only - I've not yet moved the images to a calibrated system) the super-high ISO images from the Canon seem to be noiser than those from the Nikon. Is any of this disappointing to me? Not in the slightest - it's an expected outcome. Until I learn the nuances of the Canon, and how to take advantage of its features (and I'm still at the bottom of a very steep learning curve with the D200, mind you) then this is exactly what I believe I should be seeing. I think that too many people take the learning curves for granted ..... But please feel free to disagree. ![]() g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Well I had BF issues with my D70, consistently replicated using every which means of focus testing available at the time, so I'm less inclined to agree with Gary. Though I do believe half the cases of backfocus is down to user error.
In this case, going from the sample posted, it seems to be only ~10mm off from 'ideal', which is within tolerance IMHO. Plus the fact that you've tested it now, and are aware of it - means you can then compensate for it shooting in real situations.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|