Thank God for Film

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Thank God for Film

Postby Killakoala on Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:24 pm

I just wanted to vent.

I've been in the market for a while now for a new camera to compliment my D2H. I want something with lot's of megapixels and good dynamic range so i can get some nice and sexy landscape imagery to the standard that i demand.

But...

With the D200 in short supply globally and the D2Xs just a bit too much for my budget, i have resorted to continuing with film.

Fortunately i have an F5 still. I don't really want to shoot my entire upcoming trip to Lake Mungo on a camera that's just not up to it. (D2H)

Bloody Nikon, either release a new body or get that D200 production line running again....
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby ATJ on Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:14 pm

http://www.dslrusers.com/viewtopic.php? ... &start=259

gstark wrote:23 D200 bodies will be flolloping about Poons offices later this week.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby Matt. K on Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:49 pm

Steve
D2H not up to it? :shock:
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Killakoala on Fri Aug 17, 2007 5:42 pm

Matt. K wrote:Steve
D2H not up to it? :shock:


Not for landscapes. The 4.1 megapixels are quite noticeable on A3+ prints. It has come up short on several occasions and leaves absolutely no room for creative cropping.

Don't worry Matt, I'll be keeping the D2H. It is still very capable at what it does best.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Matt. K on Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:00 pm

Steve
Even the D200 struggles with landscapes. I think we need to hang out for about 24 million pixels before we can start serious digital landscaping.
So what's this 'film' stuff you're talking about? :D
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby big pix on Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:18 pm

....... maybe a Hasselblad...... :wink:
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby Killakoala on Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:00 pm

big pix wrote:....... maybe a Hasselblad...... :wink:


Mmmm, 39MP digital back....... I doubt i will ever be able to afford one of those.

Matt, i agree that 10MP will struggle so i haven't bought one yet. Besides, i am really waiting for a sensor that is truly at least TWICE as big as the one i have, that will be more than 12.5 MP. (If i follow that philosophy through, my next camera after this on will need to be about 50MP - Scary.)

I wait in patience.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ


Return to General Discussion