POTW 15 August 2007Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
27 posts
• Page 1 of 1
POTW 15 August 2007This weeks Picture of the Week is from a post started by Kris for people to show off their shallow Depth Of Field shots. There were some very interesting shots in that group, one of which is this week's POTW. The image below by michael_ is a great example of what shallow DOF is all about.
In this image the only sharply in focus element is the subject who is staring straight back at the viewer and really grabbing your attention. And for those who are into rules (which BTW are MEANT to be broken) it's a great example of the rule of thirds too. Well done Michael. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
wow peter, thanks thats the second community who has chosen it as POTW (other was last year).
funnily enough its still probably my favourite image. again cheers mate
Top image, top colours, top comp & DOF and top choice.
Well done Michael. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
for anyone interested here is another of the same cat when he got up
and another cheers Patrick edit: i uploaded a better version, i wasnt converting to sRGB back then so the web killed the colours, here is the original image with better colour http://gallery.mvettasphotography.com/m ... 95_001.jpg . Last edited by michael_ on Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:24 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Well done Michael, as Peter said, a fine example of selective DOF.
Note to Peter: how are your cat(s) Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Excellent shot....
I missed this one first time around too...this place is busy. Michael - it would have been CATastrophic if u didn't post this pic Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Wonderful streetscape (catscape) and well deserved.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Great shot Michael, lovely captured.
André woof Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Very good shot - and a very worthy POTW!
Pentax istDS+K10D. Pentax 50mm f1.4, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 90mm f2.8 macro, Kit Lenses. http://www.redbubble.com/people/berndt2
Congrats Michael!!
5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
Chalk up another CW member for POTW
Well done Michael, i think you took this about a year ago now yeah???
This is the sort of image which really appeals to me. The composition is great and the story even better.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
ahha yeah September just after i got the 30D thanks everyone it does mean something
CongratulationsCongratulations on a very nice picture. I would like to pick your brains and ask you how did you manage to reduce the file size so much and still keep a good resolution and practically no artefacts?
thanks everyone.
zafra, the res helps i guess, also the fact i have no watermark, i saved this as jpeg quality 10, i did some tests a little while ago and the difference in quality between 10 and 12 and 8 and 10 is not even noticeable but sizewise it definately is, haha not sure if that even helps i also use the image process function in PS CS2 to save images over save as and save for web, works for me and i notice a sizeable difference.
Thank youThank you for your prompt reply Michael. I also use the Save for the Web function in CS2, but I guess I keep the bar at about 80% otherwise I notice the colour and sharpness suffer and I seem to get artifacts. I notice the other photos of the same cat were a bit sharper.
Re: Thank you
yeah the original wasnt saved as sRGB, it stayed in Adobe RGB which i notice a loss in colour when on the web, i had very little knowledge of post processing last year so the shot would have been straight from the camera .
Previous topic • Next topic
27 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|