50mm: 1.4 or 1.8???

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

50mm: 1.4 or 1.8???

Postby MHD on Tue Oct 05, 2004 10:23 am

Is the f/1.4 worth the extra dollars?
The next tool in my kit is quickly looking like being one of these two puppies...
The hype on the Maxwell page says on the 1.4:
Distortion-free images with superb resolution and colour rendition


But does not say the same for the 1.8....

Is so? Anyone tried one or both of these peices of glass?

I wandered in to my local teds the other day and strapped it on (1.8, they did not have the 1.4) but it was kinda dark and uncolourfull in the store..

Hmmm....
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby Onyx on Tue Oct 05, 2004 10:39 am

http://dr-cbtan.fotopic.net/p7095863.html

One of the best shots I've taken with the 1.4 (it belongs to the guy in the picture - Gunther). ;) It was unbelievably dark. Shot wide open, 1/5s shutter and ISO1600. I just dislike the bokeh - light sources clearly shown heptagonal shaped.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby gstark on Tue Oct 05, 2004 10:52 am

I have the 1.4, and the extra light it gathers for you is awesome. Much more than I expected.

Who needs night vision anyway?
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Glen on Tue Oct 05, 2004 11:24 am

Hi Mhd, hard decision isn't it? I have the 1:8 and am considering the 1:4 for its low light capabilities. Both lenses are rated highly, especially for the price (the 1:8 gets down to $198 these days, the fastest lens you can get for anywhere near that money!). On this site http://www.naturfotograf.com/lens_surv.html they are both rated 5 out of 5. I have also read that the 1:4 is sharper between 1:4 (it would have to be, the 1:8 doesn't go there) to 2:8, they are the same to f4, then the 1:8 is sharper. I cant remember where I read that, and may I state I don't know, just repeating what I read. Don't pay too much attention to Maxwells website, if they were absolutely correct some of the lenses would have as a description "this lens is created to stop consumers buying cheap ordinary performing third party lenses and instead buy cheap ordinary performing Nikkor lenses" :wink:

Good luck

ps Gary and Birddog are two who have the 1:4
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby birddog114 on Tue Oct 05, 2004 11:28 am

Glen,
Well said and exactly, they're!!!!
Make people confused!!!!! I have 50/ 1.4. Did not see much difference in between!
But the 85/1.4 & 85/1.8, It has lot of difference in quality and bokeh.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Tue Oct 05, 2004 1:21 pm

That extra speed will rarely be used and is not worth the money unless you are a night stalker. Save your bucks for a second lens or a flashgun.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra


Return to General Discussion