first try at portrait shot

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

first try at portrait shot

Postby NetMagi on Thu Feb 10, 2005 6:28 am

shot very low-tech

blanket for a backdrop

1000w halogen + 500w halogen (old lights intended for video work, I found in the basement of the office I work in)

I basically found some portrait shots online I liked and tried to 'emulate' the lighting.

This is the first time I've ever shot anything in controlled lighting. . so go easy on me :)

kit lens at 70mm
Aperture: F5
Shutter: 1/30th
WB: Incandescent -1

Image

-Rich
User avatar
NetMagi
Member
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:45 am
Location: Jim Thorpe, PA, US

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Feb 10, 2005 9:34 am

Rich - not bad IMO for a first try. The shadow on the right hand side around the chin needs either some PP work or if you are shooting again maybe a reflector to inject some light into this area.

Other than that nice going mate - I am sure that down the track you will be turning out many portraits.
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Glen on Thu Feb 10, 2005 9:57 am

I agree with Chris , for that look a little fill light on the right hand side would work (reflectors are cheap), the blanket works really well, I like it
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby stubbsy on Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:35 am

Rich

I'm not a portrait shooter, but from my novice eye I'd add one other thing the comments already made. I think your use of a dark background when your subject is wearing dark clothes is a distraction since their body blends into the background. Maybe a lighter blanket?
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby dooda on Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:56 am

On that same vein, (my extremely novice eye and total inexperience in shooting portrait style) I would frame in tighter. As I scroll the picture up, I find it a little more pleasing when the bottom of the frame is slightly above the red stripe in her sweater (about where the seem in her sleaves is), just below the shoulders. I know it's picky, and if someone were to contradict me on this I wouldn't defend my point for a long time, but when I look at it that's what I prefer.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby redline on Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:03 pm

yeah i agree with the others,
you need to add a fill or reflector on her left side to reduce the shadow.
the bg is a little wrinkled perhaps ironing it to reduce the wrinkles
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby hedge on Thu Feb 10, 2005 2:06 pm

Hi Rich, prretty good for a first go!

I like how you've put her on an angle, i like that you have enough light on her hair to seperate her from the background. Where were your lights positioned? I also like the shadow on her left side - rather than adding a reflector you could also try diffusing your main light a little? Would also agree with the lighter clothes thing. Using a reflector to give her some rim lighting might be cool also.

The only other thing i see is that her eyes look a little funny? I can see 4 catchlights/bright spots in her eyes. Maybe they're watering a ltitle from having so much light? I sometimes use bunnings lights and those suckers melt a model pretty quick!

cheers,

adam
He who knows how to laugh at himself will never cease to be amused...
User avatar
hedge
Member
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Blackheath, Australia

Postby NetMagi on Fri Feb 11, 2005 4:46 am

Thanks for the input everyone. The background was too dark in my opinion regardless of the color of her top, but the top sure didn't help.

As far as the wrinkles in the blanket go, I thought it added some texture.

I'm very torn between liking and disliking the shadow. The style of lighting I was copying has the shadow filled only about 50% with the fill light the same as I did. One one hand I like the look, but on the other the shadow line is just too abrupt. I think I need to bounce the light to soften it up (which I can't do with the equipment I have)

I brought a portable halogen work light in today to illuminate the blanket and tried some more shots. Here's one from today:


Image

-Rich
User avatar
NetMagi
Member
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:45 am
Location: Jim Thorpe, PA, US

Postby hedge on Fri Feb 11, 2005 9:31 am

Rich, theres heaps of really cheap things you can use as reflectors. Try picking up a car windshield heat protector (you know, those metallic things you stick in to keep the sun off), a steering wheel cover (same as above), some sheets of foam or even some white cardboard. You can also put some aluminium foil over cardboard and have an instant silver reflector.

Get her to hold it infront of her and it should reflect some of the light up under her chin and soften those shadows a little. Better yet, get someone else to hold it off to the side and angle the light where you want it. Other than than, hang a thin white sheet or some sort of light gauze infront ofyour ligths. That should soften the shadow line quite a bit. Kinda like a povo softbox!!

adam
He who knows how to laugh at himself will never cease to be amused...
User avatar
hedge
Member
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Blackheath, Australia

Postby NetMagi on Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:37 am

well, in my case it's not just needing something to bounce the light or diffuse it, but with the lighting direct I'm already shooting 1/30th shutter. I guess I could step up to a 400iso and bounce the light. . .

-Rich
User avatar
NetMagi
Member
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:45 am
Location: Jim Thorpe, PA, US

Postby gstark on Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:42 am

Rich,

Excellent work for first efforts. Good focus, reasonable balance.

Looking at the first image, it seems to me that you're using one light to either side of you, with the lower power one to your right. If you're having issues with a reflector, don't forget that you can reposition the lights - closer or further from the subject - to increase or decrease the intensity of the lighting. Moving the lower power powere one one foot forward, and the higher power one one to two feet back, might make quite a difference.

One thing that does bother me a bit is the harshness of the lights; is there some way that you could try to diffuse at least the primary light source a little, and thereby soften the shadows? Depending upon the style of the light that you're using, something as simple as a white pillowcase across the front of the light might be enough to do the job.

Throwing the light onto the background, as you've done in the second image, is a great idea. Sometimes, moving the light source closer (again) but shining it (more) obliquely across the surface to give the background light its own shape is sometimes a useful trick.

I think someone has suggested one extra light on the model's hair. I'd take that a step further, and use a third light, from the rear and above the model, onto the model's hair and shoulders. You can generate a small rimlight effect in this way, and thus provide absolute separation of the model from the background. With or without the background being separately illuminated.

Well done; I look forward to seeing your next efforts.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby gstark on Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:45 am

Rich,

NetMagi wrote:well, in my case it's not just needing something to bounce the light or diffuse it, but with the lighting direct I'm already shooting 1/30th shutter. I guess I could step up to a 400iso and bounce the light. . .


Keep the ISO as it is; move the lights a little closer to the model to counteract the light loss from diffusion, and then diffuse them as suggested.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques