canon 20d vs 40d vs 5d

If you're a user of a Canon DSLR, then welcome. This is your home.

Moderators: gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

canon 20d vs 40d vs 5d

Postby jdear on Tue Sep 11, 2007 1:08 pm

This is quite an interesting comparison:

http://wyofoto.com/40D_Image%20quality/ ... otout.html

looks like the 40D competes very well in the lower ISO bracket vs the 5D - 100-800 iso.

Adobe has yet to support the 40D in camera raw.

Jonathan
User avatar
jdear
Senior Member
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Shellharbour, NSW

interesting...

Postby zafra52 on Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:51 pm

Quiter interesting, and yet the 40D has a smaller sensor than the 30D. I guess one would have to see the real pictures because the reductions would have taken their toll on the images.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby PiroStitch on Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:09 pm

don't forget that it's the digic iii processor on the 40d compared to digic ii on the 5d and 30d. There must have been improvements made to the processing algorithms as well.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Kris on Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:19 pm

Good post on OCAU about this very thing..

http://forums.overclockers.com.au/showt ... 944&page=3

Reply here:

A camera with a 5.9x5.9 micron sensor (40D) can never hope to compete with a camera with a 8.2x8.2 micron sensor (5D) as far as signal to noise or dynamic range is concerned. This assumes all else is being equal. Sensor temperature is critical and it is easy to fudge comparisons by not making sure both sensors are at exactly the same temperature.
The signal to noise or dynamic range of a sensor is directly proportional to pixel area. The 5D has a measured dynamic range of 14.3 stops of its sensor. What this means is that because of the limits of the A to D converter being 12 bits the 5D still has maximum dynamic range even at an ISO of 500. For a 20D this is at between 100 or 200 ISO.

For more info see here.
http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedeta...ary/index.html

Yes I am biased as I have a 5DH that I use for astrophotography.

Here is an image 2.4MB of the Large Magellanic Cloud.
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~fmlee/LMC_100ED_N.jpg

Image Details
Canon 5DH, modded 100ED at 686mm f/6.8, EQ6 mount
5x8min at 1600ISO with Astronomik HA filter
6x8min at 500ISO and 6x8min at 1600ISO with Hutech Nebula filter
Used ImagesPlus to stack each set of images
Merged the nebula filter data with EasyHDR and then added the HA data with ImagesPlus. A bit of levels in PS.


They are comparing a camera thats 2 years old to a new one. The comparison is best with Nikons equiv model. I'd take a 5D over a 40D any single day of the week. FULL FRAME
5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com
My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix
My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
User avatar
Kris
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:31 am
Location: East, Sydney

Postby robert on Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:15 am

thanks kris- what you say makes sense, just not sure if there will be a "notoceable difference".

the overclockers link doesnt let me see the discussion- it may be a members only thing??

also the clarkvision link for me doesnt work, but clarkvision home is a great site- thanks
Robert
User avatar
robert
Member
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:16 pm
Location: Sutherland, Sydney


Return to Canon Corral