First Sigma 70-300 shot

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

First Sigma 70-300 shot

Postby rokkstar on Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:42 pm

Hey Guys,

This is the first shot I've taken with my new Sigma 70-300mm Super Macro II. I am really impressed with the results of this - handheld.

Image

Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Re: First Sigma 70-300 shot

Postby birddog114 on Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:45 pm

rokkstar wrote:Hey Guys,

This is the first shot I've taken with my new Sigma 70-300mm Super Macro II. I am really impressed with the results of this - handheld.

Image

Matt


Great colour and well done with the Sigma Macro job.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby W00DY on Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:49 pm

Really great image.

I might have liked to see a bigger depth of field so the front petals were in focus also... would that be possible with this lens?

I love the colour though, fantastic.

W00DY
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Postby W00DY on Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:51 pm

Is the lens you used this one:

Sigma 70-300APO AU$305.00 (Form the Bargain section)

Or is it a different lens?

W00DY
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Postby rokkstar on Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:53 pm

Hey,

That was with the aperture wide open F5.6 at 300mm.
I think its a great lens for $225 and will start me on my learning curve for tele zooms.

Thanks for the comments guys.

Matt
Last edited by rokkstar on Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby rokkstar on Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:56 pm

Woody,

its not the APO version.
It's the DL version. I read somewhere that the DL was actually a little sharper than the APO although the colour repro was better on the APO. I went for the DL in the end and am quite happy with it.

Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby W00DY on Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:57 pm

rokkstar wrote:Hey,

That was with the aperture wide open unfortunately so that's as deep as it's going to get. F5.6 at 300mm.
I think its a great lens for $225 and will start me on my learning curve for tele zooms.

Thanks for the comments guys.

Matt


Question on this lens then: To use it in Macro mode do you ned to have it at 300mm???

Sorry if this is a dumb question but I have not used a macro lens before (or telephoto with macro).

W00DY
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Postby dooda on Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:00 pm

I actually quite like that the depth of field is a little shallow, for the petals closest to the lens. However I do wish that the entire center yellow piece was sharp. Still a great shot though.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby rokkstar on Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:01 pm

W00DY wrote:Question on this lens then: To use it in Macro mode do you ned to have it at 300mm???

Sorry if this is a dumb question but I have not used a macro lens before (or telephoto with macro).

W00DY


The macro switch only functions at 200mm + so you need to be between 200-300mm to use the macro. Minimum focussing distance is about 0.95m as well i think.

Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby sirhc55 on Fri Feb 11, 2005 1:06 pm

A very good first macro attempt from this lens - well done
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby lukeo on Fri Feb 11, 2005 4:32 pm

Woody asked if the Depth of field could have been increased. Since the shot was taken wide open @ 5.6 I'd have to say probably ... with F8 or F11 or even F22 the petals would have been in focus.

A great shot, amazing colour reproduction and very sharp. Puts a new spin on the humble flower.
lukeo
Member
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:42 am
Location: Kensington, WA

Postby rokkstar on Fri Feb 11, 2005 4:35 pm

Yraen

Yes thats right. I got a wee bit mixed up. i thought he meant a shallower DOF.

Many thanks for the comments

Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques