Morning at Dee WhyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Morning at Dee WhyI had to race out this morning at about 5:20 am to take some photos for work. I only had about half an hour to create the pano and play with one other photo before I had to get ready for work.
I wish I had a ND filter (even my polarising filter) with me so I could go for slower shutter speeds, however, this is the first: Is the concrete repair at the bottom of the image distracting? This is a 7 hand-held shot pano taken with the 20mm lens and quickly stitched using the Photomerge function in CS3. I would like more time to play with this one to bring out more colour from the clouds and perhaps lighten up the foreground a touch. Click for larger image... Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Seeing as you asked.. yes I find the concrete repair distracting... but that should be easily fixed with the healing brush/clone tool I would think..
I also think that you did a cracking job for such a short time.. the second one is my pic ... the colours are superb! The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
I like the first better than the second, but I'm a sucker for those pools on the shore line, so much opportunity!
I'd like to see a tad more contrast in it, and to be honest I wouldn't have noticed the concrete repair if you hadn't mentioned it. Brett
Thanks for the feedback guys. Sue, I may apply a grad ND filter in PP for the pano to see if I can get more detail and colour out of the foreground.
The softness in the first comes about due to the B&W conversion I used - this was totally intentional. This also explains the relatively low contrast. In fact, I would have liked to go for an even softer look but I couldn't reduce the contrast much further. Cheers Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
If the dreamy look is what you were looking for Patrick you've achieved it on the first. I do like that image!
Sounds a bit girly, doesn't it? Thanks for the comments. Actually, I am a little disappointed with the composition of the first as I would have preferred to be a bit more to the right, however, I don't have an underwater housing for the D200 Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Adding to the previous images, here are a couple more variations of a theme.
I would appreciate any feedback on these... Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|