Morning at Dee Why

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Morning at Dee Why

Postby Reschsmooth on Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:19 pm

I had to race out this morning at about 5:20 am to take some photos for work. I only had about half an hour to create the pano and play with one other photo before I had to get ready for work.

I wish I had a ND filter (even my polarising filter) with me so I could go for slower shutter speeds, however, this is the first:

Is the concrete repair at the bottom of the image distracting?

Image

This is a 7 hand-held shot pano taken with the 20mm lens and quickly stitched using the Photomerge function in CS3. I would like more time to play with this one to bring out more colour from the clouds and perhaps lighten up the foreground a touch.

Click for larger image...

Image
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby dviv on Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:36 pm

Nice pictures Patrick,

I really like the look of the first one but it looks a tad soft on my monitor - any chance of a slight sharpen?
User avatar
dviv
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1085
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:50 am
Location: North Shore, Sydney

Postby Bindii on Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:38 pm

Seeing as you asked.. yes I find the concrete repair distracting... but that should be easily fixed with the healing brush/clone tool I would think..

I also think that you did a cracking job for such a short time.. the second one is my pic ... the colours are superb! :)
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Postby bwhinnen on Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:40 pm

I like the first better than the second, but I'm a sucker for those pools on the shore line, so much opportunity!

I'd like to see a tad more contrast in it, and to be honest I wouldn't have noticed the concrete repair if you hadn't mentioned it.

Brett
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Postby Reschsmooth on Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:47 pm

Thanks for the feedback guys. Sue, I may apply a grad ND filter in PP for the pano to see if I can get more detail and colour out of the foreground.

The softness in the first comes about due to the B&W conversion I used - this was totally intentional. :D This also explains the relatively low contrast. In fact, I would have liked to go for an even softer look but I couldn't reduce the contrast much further.


Cheers
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby bwhinnen on Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:55 pm

If the dreamy look is what you were looking for Patrick you've achieved it on the first. I do like that image!
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Postby Reschsmooth on Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:31 pm

bwhinnen wrote:If the dreamy look is what you were looking for Patrick you've achieved it on the first. I do like that image!


Sounds a bit girly, doesn't it? Thanks for the comments.

Actually, I am a little disappointed with the composition of the first as I would have preferred to be a bit more to the right, however, I don't have an underwater housing for the D200 :D
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby Reschsmooth on Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:00 am

Adding to the previous images, here are a couple more variations of a theme.

I would appreciate any feedback on these...

Image

Image
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby colin_12 on Sat Sep 29, 2007 11:37 am

You have done well to get the wavws looking even in the pano shots.
#3 grabs my attention more than the others though.
Regards Colin
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques