Lions and tigers and bears...Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Lions and tigers and bears...Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Isn't that the Snow Leopard Leigh?
Great shots of it and the bear though, the Lion, typically aloof! Brett
Leigh - #1 - I like the simplicity, #4 is the standout though. Nice B & W too.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I agree entirely with Peter. Excellent images. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
I may be in the minority here... I like #2 and #3, especially the pensive look in #2.
I'd love to see the colour versions (not being a fan of black and white).
....... I agree with Peter........
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Leigh,
You've been posting some great shots of the animals from your latest visit of the zoo. Most people would just have ignored taking the lion photo but the way you have it and in b&w gives a real interesting take on a much photographed animal, I like it. #2 of the snow leopard is also very nice wit the eye contact. As many above, the bear shot is a classic for me, Cheers, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Ok, so it's a snow leopard and not a tiger. It wouldn't have had the same title with "Lions and snow leopards and bears..."
I'll post the colours when I get home from work. Cheers for the comments all. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Leigh
Haven't you been listening? RULE OF THIRDS!! RULE OF THIRDS!! They would have been much better if you only had only shown a third of the animal! : I think that's how it works? Regards
Matt. K
I agree with Peter & Bernie!
#1 has simplicity, but the lighting and therefore the texture makes it wonderful. It is also unusual(= good!) because the animal has its back to the camera, yet it's obviously a snow leopard / tiger err... lion! Excellent image. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|