A couple of bird portraits (utterly safe for work)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A couple of bird portraits (utterly safe for work)These two I shot at the aptly named Featherdale Park earlier this week.
They're an owl and an eagle Our resident ornithologists are welcome to fill in the blanks... The owl: The eagle: C&C as always invited and greatly appreciated. Cheers Steffen. lust for comfort suffocates the soul
As far as I know (no comments) the only Hawk Owl we have here in Aust with a yellow beak is a Barking Owl - Ninox connivens
Now your eagle photo is actually a Brahminy Kite -Milvus indus (Haliastur indus in some references) Excellent clarity in both photo's, esp the Owl The Owls eyes really makes this shot. Nunquam requîrere a aptus occãsiõ ad claudere sûrsum
I am wondering if its a BooBook Owl... although they are so similar that it could be almost either really... I think that both of these images are brilliant... very good quality and they certainly wouldnt look out of place in a bird book... The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
The feathers around the eyes dont look like a BooBook. Also of the 5 sub sp. of BooBook, the only 1 that has yellow eyes is race leucopsis and that has more of a dark feathers marking around the eyes. Race lurida is the closest BooBook colouring to this, but the yellow beak suggests to me the northern darker form of the Barking Owl Nunquam requîrere a aptus occãsiõ ad claudere sûrsum
Steffen. I don't know much about the birds, but I know a good image when I see one and these are crackers. #1 in particular is a standout.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Steffan,
I love them both. The owl, for the reasons already noted, but in the image of the kite you have beautifully controlled the exposure of the white feathers on the neck and head. This image has a very high contrast range, and you have reigned it in magnificently. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Thanks all for your kinds words, and for putting me straight on the eagle vs kite thing
Photography has become slightly less frustrating since I had my AF module replaced the other week... Cheers Steffen. lust for comfort suffocates the soul
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|