(Very) Belated Oran Park Shots.Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
(Very) Belated Oran Park Shots.Hi all,
As I now have broadband again, I have been uploading shots from a few rounds of racing I've attended. These shots from are from Oran Park. C&C asked for, welcomed and appreciated. Rick Kelly leads Jamie Whincup through the back section of Oran Park. Rick Kelly flying onto the pit straight of Oran Park. (dustbunnies and all). Todd Kelly brakes to avoid running into the back end of another slow Falcon.... (yes, I know they won at Bathurst....) Apologies for the black borders, the images are used elsewhere also. 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
Hi Alan, good shots mate and i am getting to be jealous as i have not been to any motorsport events lately not even my Moto GP this year as work and leaving it too late to get organised but maybe next year so good to see some action with these pics.
Cheers John BBJ D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
Alan,
#1-Awesome, action packed! Too much foreground though I think, I'd like to see the cars more central. Maybe give it a kick of contrast too? #2-I see this sort of image published all the time in major motorsport publications and general media; I can never understand why. It just seems like blurry rubbish to me. But if people are happy to publish it... #3-Great! To be critical the bonnet is a bit blown, might need a bump of contrast, and shame about the DJR car but not much you can do. Well panned, and great flame. Edit: jeez I seem critical... Hmm, don't take these the wrong way Alan, I reckon #1 and #3 are great images, in fact I'm sure they're all publishable. The comments are what I'd say about my own images (and I tend to be rather a perfectionist about my photos), so these may be unduly harsh.
Great work as always Alan.
1 - Agree more contrast needed in this shot, other than that I think it works well, the amount of foreground balances the amount of track behind the cars. 2 - Nicely saturated and contrasty but I think this needs a little more point of reference. It just seems to be missing something, perhaps it is because it is a Holden all on its own 3 - Superb! This is racing! Love the angle, the closeness the feel of speed, the colour the contrast! Well done Alan. Cheers Brett
Thanks guys.
Trent, no your comments aren't harsh. I guess the appeal of #2 is it has an artsy feel to it. I have been reliably informed that CAMS likes to see these exact types of images in photographer applications. I like them also, it is harder to get this type of image with a single in focus area than panning. Maybe it's the challenge? I have purposely left in the foreground in #1 to use DOF, the track and marbles are OOF, as is the car behind, which gives a feeling of depth. Well, I think so anyway... I may be speaking out my bum. Agree with you Brett and Trent about getting more contrast in #1 and #3, can't believe I need more contrast.... BBJ, yes, get trackside asap!!! Your posts have been missed. Michael, you can put your Canon where it's high ISO would be useful... Thanks for taking the time to comment! 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
Love all 3 , especially #2. Did anyone get some shots of the MOTO gp yesterday?
Ozi President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Cheers Bill, the black borders are because I also have the watermarked and PPed for sending them to various folks for possible use, that way they can't really use them for anything other than looking at. 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
#1 is excellent
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8. flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4) jamesdwade.com dishonourclothing.com
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|