New Canon Lens

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

New Canon Lens

Postby Paul on Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:16 pm

A couple of new hunks of glass from Canon to keep everyone happy.

http://www.usa.canon.com/templatedata/p ... flens.html
Nikon F80D, FM2n
RRS BH-55, 055XPROB
Smugmug
User avatar
Paul
Senior Member
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:32 am
Location: Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia

Postby Kris on Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:47 am

Loving the F2 200, very nice indeed! I want :)
5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com
My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix
My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
User avatar
Kris
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:31 am
Location: East, Sydney

Postby Yi-P on Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:50 am

Looks like Canon caught up with a 200mm F2 against Nikon... Not sure how it performs but I guess it wont be any bad... :)
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby padey on Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:23 pm

I'll have to compare the f2 to the Canon 200mm f1.8.
Andrew


Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
padey
Member
 
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
Location: Sydney, Hills Area

Postby ozimax on Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:12 pm

padey wrote:I'll have to compare the f2 to the Canon 200mm f1.8.


Canon 200mm F1.8. Is it in production any more?
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby jdear on Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:35 am

Canon 200mm F1.8. Is it in production any more?


no it was discountinued in 2004 and those that have them usually want to hang onto them.

Some pop up on ebay - one on there now for $4800 USD (here) Shooting with one is difficult without a monopod (as it is heavy - 3kg) and you'll have to shoot over 1/250th.

if your happy to put up with this, you'll have better bokeh than the 85:1.2, 135:2.0, 300:2.8, 500:4 lenses.

deets on this amazing lense here

Jonathan
User avatar
jdear
Senior Member
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Shellharbour, NSW


Return to General Discussion