Seagull surveying the surfModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
20 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Seagull surveying the surfI got this shot of a seagull waiting for the right set at Bondi today. Taken with the Sigma 70-300mm
Comments welcome. Cheers Matt
Re: Seagull surveying the surf
Great shot of the gull, I like it. Can I ask how much PP you have done to get these colours? No matter what I try I can't seem to get these vivid colours straight from the camera. I have always wondered if people actually can get this result with no PP or do you pump up the colour or something in Photoshop? Cheers, W00DY Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
Hi Woody,
do you use a circular polarising filter at all ? I do from time to time and it makes quite a difference. Cheers CD
Thanks guys.
Woody, the colour from the camera was pretty good. All I did here was a levels PP. The histogram was dead in the centre but the hightlights and shadow arrows were a little way away from the edges. I didnt touch colour at all. Matt
Hi CD, Yeah I do use a CP and have noticed a difference with it on, but nothing to this extent. Usually I can only see a difference in the sky if there are clouds. <stupid warning> Is there a right and wrong way to use a CP??? I guess I have always just rotated it until the sky looks a little darker. Is there anything else you need to know? W00DY Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
I like the colour too. Only thing I'm not hot about in the thin strip of sky at the top. I would have shown more or cropped it out.
Nice looking gull, like the colours as well, the dark blue back ground sets it off.
well done D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
Oh I hate you........I had like 100 shots of a bloody huge seagull in the UK with a lovely night sunset backdrop. However I forgot to copy them to my portable drive and then when I went out on another shoot I formatted the CF......grrrr.
That's your problem from the beginning, many members advised you to have more than CF cards in your bags while you're travelling. Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Great shot, I like the bright colours and the simple, but strong composition. Looking at the pictures, I have the impression you must have been lying on the grass to take this shot and the perspective makes this shot very engaging (you're not l'ooking down' on the seagull)
Well done! Link.
Woody,
what are your camera settings such as: saturation sharpness colour mode tone compensation hue adjustment Cheers CD
At the moment I have everything left as default except colour mode which I changed to Mode II (Adobe RGB). I guess I should experiment a little with the in camera settings W00DY Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
I had two 512mb cards Birddog, so I wasn't limited to one. I'll also be looking at getting a larger card soon - atleast 2gb. There was also atleast a week between when I took the last lot of photos and formatting them so it wasn't like I accidently did it on the same outting so the data should of been transferred off the CF cards. I was just stupid, and forgot to do it.
Woody,
my camera settings are: saturation: +enhanced sharpness: +1 colour mode: IIIa (sRGB) tone compensation: custom (could be due to custom curve ?) hue adjustment: -3 I have adopted these settings without necessarily having a clear understanding of every single setting. They seem to work for me and it is only in flat light that I may find that images are a little flat. HTH Cheers CD
Yep, better than the ave. seagull portrait. I love the well saturated colours, still looks plenty natural, head tilt is a good quirk. Don't care if / how much diddle / fiddle factor there is, we are making images here......
this one's a goodie. Shoot early - Shoot often
The seagulls that I was taking photos of were Herron Gulls and they were that big they made the Aussie gulls look small. These suckers almost needed clearance to land. Very tame too because all the tourists give them fish and chips. Was so annoyed because I sat in the car with the 70-300G mounted and rested on the window snapping atleast 100 shots of the bird and the surrounding coast as the sun was about to disappear PS. Very nice seagull
I agree, but I always feel that I dont want to take it too far. It's that age old PP discussion again, but I still want to retain the natural element to the shot. Kipper, bad luck about the card mate, and losing all the seagull shots. At least it means you have an excuse to go out again and recapture. Matt
Previous topic • Next topic
20 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|