slightly bigger orchidModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
slightly bigger orchidG'day
also tried a few shots of Dendrobium lichenastrum The first one came out ok. It is at f-stop 29 so can not get (much) more depth of field. I think iso and speed are wound up as plant blowing around and hands a shaking, and ring flash on. And still being lazy and hand holding a 100mm macro lense with 50mm of extension tubes on canon 40d. What else should I have done And the flower range is from 4 to 7mm for this Australian orchid. Positively huge! Looking in, it has a tongue like my rottweillier, just on a different scale The colour range is fantastic. Deep dark maroon stripes to lime yellows. I quite like this one, showing how it grows with an old steam in focus across the front of the flower Hmmm, maybe i better go take some motor sport pictures so you guys don't get the wrong (or right) idea about me! Col, see my library (of reduced size shots) at flickr as most of the lichenastrums are your plants! http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazzas-orchids/ Cheers Waz
I tend to take small things a tad dark as when using the ring flash it is very easy to blow out the colour, get a large portion of relfection with no surface detail, or even make the flower translucent. So i find I take to dark. Also the preview on my camera is always lighter than my computer screens at w
home and at work. Regards Waz
Looks a little dark to me
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
These are pretty interesting orchids. Were they in a garden or did you find them in the bush?
I quite like the first two even if they are a tad dark. I would suggest you bracket your shots, 1 or 1/3 of a stop on each side so three photos. That way when you get back to the computer, you'll be able to figure out which one actually works best exposure wise. That's how I've been learning anyways. I would certainly recommend using a tripod, you don't mention if you did. There are some good ones for macro work that allow you to get close. An angle viewfinder could also help when for a low perspective. If you need to be right on the ground, a bean bag works sometimes. I also carry a couple of small reflectors with me. One is actually translucent to help in high sun so I also use it to block the wind at times. To get that extra hand, I have a Wimberley clamp that affixes to my tripod and holds the reflector in place while I adjust the camera. cheers, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Radar
Good to see someone else from lake Macquarie! I am at Valentine. I cheated and "found" these plants in my shade house. They occur naturally along mid coast of Queensland. Yes I need to try out this lens. I couldn't bracket the shot as the flash is manual so I am using the suck it and see technique. the only way to get more light was to drop the f stop. I only just picked it up and lazily was using by hand. To compensate i was going max depth of field, and the best ones appeared where i had pushed to f 29 or 32 and the limit of max ISO (1600 when "tone definition" turned on) and the ring flash just on max output. Got frustrated tring to get the labellum of the Dendrobium toressae (not pictured) in focus as it was always fuzzy. DohHH! the actual plant has a very finely fur on the labellum! need to put the camera on a tripod (haven't done that yet either). I think that one good thing may be the live view. Have not used it yet to comment on. After a weekend away chasing ground orchids, I think the been bag for me might be the go. It seems to take longer to get up off the groung each year (and plant) that goes by. The reflectors sound good. Is it a home made job or a purchased item? And you find the wimberly clamp good then? see you round Waz
Waz,
there are a few of us from the Newcastle region.
The reflectors and the clamps can be bought from B&H, that's where I ordered them from, click on links below for the store items. Winberley Plamp Photoflex Gold/Silver Reflector Photoflex Translucent The plamp is really good to hold the reflectors in place and also to hold branches out of the way or hold flower/plant in place while taking the photo. The photoflex litediscs are 12" and fold nicely to fit in your pocket. Cheers, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Hey Waz,
That is a neat gallery. It makes me want to build a glass house again. Your use of the extension rings is loosing you some depth. You should be able to get pretty good crops out of the centre with just the new lense. You should also be able to stop down a bit further. Regards Colin
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|