ChurchModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Lovely exposure and composition. Might want to either crop or clone out the leaves over hanging the top and top left corner as it doesn't do much in terms of providing sense of perspective and scale.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Just to play devils advocate - I think I would prefer the picture with more leaves. This foreground texture provides a nice perspective, but there are only enough leaves to slightly annoy rather than to frame. If there were enough leaves a leaf frame might be quite nice...
Just another thought
Nun, to my knowledge. A couple of thoughts on this image. On the trees framing the image ... what Mitchell has said is spot on: if you could include more of the branches as a means of framing the image, that would be good. In the first image there's not enough to frame, but there's enough to distract. But the concrete driveway is what bothers me in this image, and it strikes me that perhaps there may have been a better angle from which to shoot this image and from which the concrete may not have been as obvious as it is. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
this is what I noticed first too, and couldnt take my eyes away from it. I love the textures of old stone, and this clashes. having said that, we sometimes capture somehting we like, with a few niggling elements. if you are into editing, perhaps consider darkening the driveway, making it less prominant (burn, or paint over at say 10% opacity). if I was doing that, I'd brush over the red car too. lastly, in your recent crop, there is a telegraph pole camera right, crop it if you can.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|