Reworked IR photo

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Reworked IR photo

Postby greencardigan on Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:27 pm

I've had another go it PP one of my previous IR shots. Last time I PP'd it it was too dark.

I've done 2 versions.

Image

Image
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby MCWB on Thu Nov 01, 2007 4:42 pm

First one is amazing. Second one is also good, but a bit blue in the top half for mine perhaps? To be totally nitpicky the foregrounds are a bit blown, but it doesn't distract very much for me. Print that first one BIG! :D
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby !~DeViNe~DaRkNeSs~! on Thu Nov 01, 2007 7:02 pm

I love the 2nd, the colour just sets it off beautifully :D
Canon EOS 40D
Canon EOS 400D
50mm 1.8 EF
User avatar
!~DeViNe~DaRkNeSs~!
Member
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Essendon - MELBOURNE

Postby MATT on Fri Nov 02, 2007 6:27 am

I love the clouds. Well done.Love both versions also..

MATT
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----

Postby greencardigan on Fri Nov 02, 2007 8:57 am

Thanks for the comments.
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby robert on Fri Nov 02, 2007 11:25 am

MCWB wrote:Second one is also good, but a bit blue in the top half for mine perhaps? To be totally nitpicky the foregrounds are a bit blown, but it doesn't distract very much for me. :D


I think the 2nd almost has it- the false colours are great- but agree with MCWB, maybe a bit blue in the sky and the lawn is a little blown.

Great church- where is it?
Robert
Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
User avatar
robert
Member
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:16 pm
Location: Sutherland, Sydney

Postby greencardigan on Fri Nov 02, 2007 11:29 am

robert wrote:Great church- where is it?


Ipswich
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby robert on Fri Nov 02, 2007 11:33 am

greencardigan wrote:Ipswich


bugger- Hoped it was somewhere down the coast I hadnt discovered.
Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
User avatar
robert
Member
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:16 pm
Location: Sutherland, Sydney

Postby zafra52 on Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:20 pm

I like both images, which remind me of a snowed landscape. I like the first one because of its B&W looks despite the fact of being and IR image; and the second because the beautiful colours somehow contrast revealing the IR nature of the image. Do I make sense?
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Alex on Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:33 pm

I really like the first one.
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Geoff on Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:00 pm

I love the 1st one - eery! :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Bubby on Mon Nov 05, 2007 1:20 am

Like the first one. 2nd one is nice but too much foregroudn i think..
Bubby
Newbie
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:17 pm
Location: Cabarita

Postby Greg B on Mon Nov 05, 2007 7:06 am

I like them both too. I think the first one may be the better of the two, but I also like the colours you have intoduced to the second. Great work.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques

cron