Orchid flowers

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Orchid flowers

Postby greencardigan on Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:44 pm

One of our new orchids.

Flash for the 1st one was bounced off the ceiling

Image

Image
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby Biggzie on Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:16 pm

I used to grow Sarcochilus years ago. This one looks like either hartmannii or fitzgeraldii. Probably fitzgeraldii.

#1, I dont think the floor boards are the best background and it could have maybe used a slightly stronger frontal lighting to make them stand out a bit more.

#2 looks fine, but have you thought about trying one angled to show the inside paterns of the labellum
Nunquam requîrere a aptus occãsiõ ad claudere sûrsum
User avatar
Biggzie
Member
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:51 am
Location: Mt Gambier, SA

Postby wazonthehill2 on Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:30 pm

It would be a Sarc. Fitzhart - a hartmanii cross fitgeraldi hybrid.

With the first one.
The plant gets lost on the table in the first shot.
If you want to maintain your depth of field and with the with flowers and cream pot, a dark back drop would work well. Either Black or grey (surpisingly blue often looks good too).

With the second play with the light / flash and see if you can capture more of those great sparlkes that you get with the light on the flower. That really gives the sarc shot the wow factor. That is really hard to achieve without washing out the colour.

Cheers
User avatar
wazonthehill2
Member
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Valentine Newcastle NSW Australia

Postby chrisk on Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:08 pm

for the second. i found shooting thru something like white baking paper, (if you don;t have umbrellas etc) brings out alot more detail in orchids. bump your flash EV's up. down dependant on the light you're getting but it should diffuse enuf to give you a softer lighting.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques