New toyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
18 posts
• Page 1 of 1
New toyI received my new (old) toy yesterday - I need to get a battery for the viewfinder, but I am looking forward to whacking some filum through it.
Here are some shots of it: C&C welcome. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
That looks to be in excellent condition.
What's the shutter count? Good to see you're using the B&W CF card g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Thanks guys
The F2-6 are next on the list, but it will take a while to complete the list. The F6 price is still mighty high. Gary, not sure about shutter count or how to check. I am looking forward to taking this baby out on the film day planned for next year. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Very nice.
One of the girls at work recently purchased an F1 body with 4 lenses and a viewfinder as a gift for a friend of hers. Apparently this friend had had one that was given to her by her grandpa before he passed away and it was stolen, so the F1 has a fairly deep sentimental value to her. All the gear was delivered to the office so I was able to have a hold and a play, and I have to say, the fit and finish of the camera was superb. I'd really love to get my hands on some classic camera gear, but I think i need to cross everything off the list for my current camera before I go nostalgia crazy. Very nice find. Is there plans to hunt down additional lenses for it?
Matt K - if the F is the Prince, what is the King?
Matt C - that's a great story about your friend's purchase. I do plan to get a few MF primes for this and the FE - my plans are to get a 135, a 50 (or 55 macro or even the 55 1.2) and maybe a wider angle. I don't do much long telephoto stufff. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Matt, PM sent shortly. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Very nice toy Patrick! I've been eyeing off a few old school cameras in Melbourne. Found this 2nd hand camera shop selling really antique stuff, run by an elderly chinese lady
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Go for it Wayne - as a Canon user, you would be used to 1960s ergonomics. (just kidding). Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
I love the treatment on the last image Patrick. It really seems to suit the Camera, and a nice new toy too!
I would say that camera is about twice as old as I am!! But it looks in better shape than I am (smooth and shiney)
Now I'm tuning in for updates on your F2-6 Then all the FE, FM, FA...
Thanks Brett.
Yip - it may take another year to get to the F6, but hopefully the F2, F3 & F4 pretty soon. Now, already have on FE. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
nice nice nice!
i always have admired nikon's cameras since i was a young boy. in fact, ive often thought that if i had a bit more cash, i'd set about collecting some of the older nikon cameras (and perhaps even D1 series - they were revolutionary), simply because they are all so perfect. for this reason i'd have a hard time selling any of the bodies i currently possess (d200, d70s, f4s, f601)... body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8. flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4) jamesdwade.com dishonourclothing.com
Patrick, you missed out the FIVE??? How could you!?
What was poorly implied was that the F6 would be about a year, and the F2-4 would be relatively soon and the F5 would be somewhere between pretty soon and a year. Or, I just get an F5 pretty soon...... Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
18 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|