Manta under the Spotlight

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Manta under the Spotlight

Postby SteveGriffin on Sun Nov 11, 2007 9:54 pm

Simon and I spent a few hours today trying to understand studio lighting.

Here are a couple of my shots of Simon for critique.

Image
Image
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
So many things to do - so little time.
User avatar
SteveGriffin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 815
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Rochedale Brisbane

Postby Reschsmooth on Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:06 pm

I think they are great for a start. My honest critiques would be:

In photo 1:

1. I like the choice of background - what did you use?
2. The right eye could possibly use with a bit more light - I think you had the main light a little too high.
3. There are a couple of hot spots on Simon's face, especially forehead and nose. Did you modify your light source at all?

In photo 2:

1. Not sure if available for you, but a second light source (even a white reflector of sorts) on your right side (Simon's left) would have filled in the shadow on that side, particularly near his nose - very hard shadows.
2. I like the idea of the camera prop, however, it is almost obscured by shadow - I actually didn't notice it the first time I looked at the pic. Again, some fill light could have helped there.
3. As in the first, there are a couple of hot-spots on Simon's forehead.

The choice of pose and clothing really suit the images you have captured. Well done.

Cheers
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby Manta on Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:13 pm

Some good points there Patrick - thanks. Here's one of Steve that I shot with more traditional light positions:

Image

Here is my take on one of Steve's shots of me - the key light was high as we were trying to duplicate the effect we'd seen in a book (Grey's "Master Lighting Guide fro Portrait Photographers, page 44 if anyone has the book) In PP, I paid particular attention to eliminating the hot spots and lifting some detail from the shadow areas:

Image
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby gasgasgas on Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:24 am

Simon,

I think your take on Steves shot of you is very good. It brings out the shadow detail a lot more and you can see a bit of a reflection from the reflector/bounce card down to your left in your left eye.

In the full size image of you that Steve originally posted, you can pick out the reflector in your eye again, but the shadow detail just isn't there for me.

Not bad for some experimenting though. Good effort.

Cheers
Simon Grounds
Previously disappointed Nikon user. Now happy to have stuck with it. :) Bring on the lotto win for some new Nikon's ;)
User avatar
gasgasgas
Member
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:09 pm
Location: Palm Beach, Gold Coast

Postby gstark on Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:11 am

In the shots of Simon, I feel that the primary light source is too high, and too far to the side of Simon. It should be moved closer to the shooting position, to aid the spread of light around the front of the subject, and thus reduce the shadows and contrast range that its current position is introducing.

I'd also like to see the exposure reduced slightly; I think that they're currently a tad overexposed.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby SteveGriffin on Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:19 am

Thanks for all of the comments. I should have paid a bit more attention to those highlights.

We were actually trying to reproduce "Rembrandt" style lighting. Most of his portraiture has a single high window as the light source with deep shadows. We had a reflector on camera right which filled in the shadows considerably but from most comments not quite enough.
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
So many things to do - so little time.
User avatar
SteveGriffin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 815
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Rochedale Brisbane

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:40 am

Steve, to achieve traditional "Rembrandt" lighting, as I understand it, you want to get the triangle of light on the side of the face opposite the light source to have it's top at about eyebrow level or just below. As Gary said, your primary light is too high, which means Simon's left eye is in shadow.

Different people will require different light positions - I have noticed with most babies, their eyes haven't sunken in to their heads as much as adults (sounds great, doesn't it), and therefore you can (and probably want to) get away with a much higher light source.

For someone with deeper set eyes, you need to lower the light source to avoid the shadows.

Anyway, the experimenting and learning is a lot of fun, and I am sure Simon was a better behaved subject than my 5 month old boy! :D
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby gstark on Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:08 am

SteveGriffin wrote:Most of his portraiture has a single high window as the light source with deep shadows.


Note, though, that this light source will be softer, diffused light. It'll actually be a typical northlight, really, whereas what I'm seeing here is quite direct.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby the foto fanatic on Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:12 am

Looks like you boys were having fun!

And using live models is a great way to learn.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby Geoff on Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:57 pm

cricketfan wrote:And using live models is a great way to learn.


As opposed to dead ones? :D :D
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Manta on Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:48 pm

:D :D :D
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby Bindii on Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:09 pm

Hey you both did really well! The lighting to my inexperienced eye's looks good... and I also like the poses.. the models are a bit naf though... *grins*..

Sorry I couldnt be there... life beckons unfortunately.. :cry:
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques

cron