DOF

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

DOF

Postby chrisk on Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:51 pm

ok...one if very shallow and one is quite deep. i personally much prefer the shallow one but most people seem to like the ones where the whole subject is in focus. what say the masses ? :?:

i won't bore everyone to death with the lighting etc. not sure too many are interested in the strobist side of macros.

Image

Image
Last edited by chrisk on Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby Dargan on Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:55 pm

I think if the legs were sharp in the first image I would like it more. As it is the second image is much preferable to me. Good colour and clear definition of the insect. Very Nice.
In the end we know Nothing, but in the meantime Learn like crazy.
Your Camera Does Matter Nikon D70 D200 D300
PPOK
User avatar
Dargan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 702
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:22 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Postby MATT on Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:04 pm

I like them both..Sorry no help.

MATT
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----

Postby Yi-P on Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:11 pm

I like #1 for how it turned out. But a bit more DOF with the legs in the shot won't hurt :P

And personally I feel that the first one is bit oversaturated, maybe just me?
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Bindii on Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:17 pm

Yi-P wrote:And personally I feel that the first one is bit oversaturated, maybe just me?


Nope.. its me too... :)

I actually like the second image the best because the composition of it is perfect... the bug takes up just enough room in the frame so as its not overpowering... its nice and sharp too..
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Postby chrisk on Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:28 pm

funny you should say that...one of the first times i've used colour IIIa, i normally use Ia or II. have just changed it and replaced, much better. thanks. :)

bindii, you're right, the composition is better in the second. the first is "extreme macro" with tubes added aswell. thats actually barely cropped at all. the little sucker was a bee's "you know what" away. it's actually one of my favourite macro shots. i think i'd be alone though. lol
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby mickeyjuice on Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:56 pm

#1 for me, but I'm a sucker for razor-thin DOF.
User avatar
mickeyjuice
Member
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:48 am
Location: West Brunswick, Victoria


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques

cron