the farm

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

the farm

Postby Big Red on Thu Nov 15, 2007 1:59 pm

taken this morning on the way to work.
cropped some bits out but JPEG straight from camera as whatever i did failed to improve it.
Image
User avatar
Big Red
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2520
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Jacobs Well Qld ... mossie capital of the world

Postby Killakoala on Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:03 pm

Seems to be lacking something, except colour. It has plenty of that.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Big Red on Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:16 pm

here a dark version that i used a bit of shadows on...
Image
User avatar
Big Red
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2520
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Jacobs Well Qld ... mossie capital of the world

Postby Big Red on Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:19 pm

and here the version i did late last night ...
Image
User avatar
Big Red
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2520
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Jacobs Well Qld ... mossie capital of the world

Postby Bindii on Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:45 pm

The second one you posted is fantastic..much better than the original one.. I'm not 100% sure about the night time version.. maybe if a little of the foreground was cropped as its not adding much to the image in the way of interest (the dark area that is)...

still going wow over the second one.. :)
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:54 pm

Shane - #1 wins by a long mile as it retains definition that is lost in #2. The last shot is superb except for the scratch on the lens :lol: :lol:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby mickeyjuice on Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:42 pm

I'm clearly in the #1 over #2 camp here.
User avatar
mickeyjuice
Member
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:48 am
Location: West Brunswick, Victoria

Postby Bandit on Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:07 am

#2 over #1 for me
User avatar
Bandit
Member
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 5:14 pm
Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Postby Steffen on Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:30 am

Hi Shane,
I prefer #1 to #2, even if it looks a bit like a Windows desktop background. It conveys a feeling of serenity and beauty.

I do like the night shot as well. Was that a satellite blinking across the sky?

EDIT: after looking at it for a bit longer, I reckon #3 would do better with a third of the black stuff at the bottom, and the gained space added at the top.

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby Big Red on Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:04 am

i reckoned 1 was too light and 2 was too dark and couldn't decide between the two different pics ... so far its 50/50 :lol:

the third shot was an attempt at getting a scene out of star light but it was almost totally black and when i hit it with shadows +100 to see if my aim and focus were ok [it was pitch black when i took it at F2.8 30 seconds] i liked the result of the extra noise. :D
User avatar
Big Red
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2520
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Jacobs Well Qld ... mossie capital of the world

Postby Wocka on Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:53 am

No# 1 for me, the colours are great. Although I like the deeper blue of the sky in No# 2.

No# 3 would have been a perfect attempt of some stobist work to light up the old buiding.

Cheers.
Warwick
=======
Canon 40D : 350D
Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
User avatar
Wocka
Member
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:05 pm
Location: Northern Beaches

Postby the foto fanatic on Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:11 am

#2 is the one... that misses out! It just looks under-exposed to me.

But I love #3, and I think #1 is pretty good also.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby matt-chops on Sat Nov 17, 2007 12:27 am

#1 seems to have more vibrant colour but #2 has a far more appealing sky... perhaps if you were to mask the sky of #2 into #1 it would make the perfect combination? That should be fairly easy to do using the channels mixer in photoshop.
User avatar
matt-chops
Member
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:25 pm
Location: Southside, Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques