Anyone used the Nikon MC-36 remote release on the D200?Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Anyone used the Nikon MC-36 remote release on the D200?I figure im going to want to do some slow shutter/cable release work soon, and have been using the infra red remote on the D70 to date.
Has anyone used the MC-36? Im interested to hear from you please Steve Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Same, got from poon with another order for like $8.00 or something. Works a treat. MATT
I have both the nikon, and the poon cheapie, get the cheapie, does the job, at 1/3 price.
cant imagine an application for the multi function remote, just get off your ass and read the LCD...
I used to be in the why would you want one school of thought,
after all the cheapie just works. but I got hold of a mc36 a while ago in a jumping ship sale at the right price and love it, just as a cable release, you dont notice a difference, but at night, when you want exposures of 1 minute and beyond, it beats using your watch and a cable release hands down. Its backlight means you can set long exposures without needing your torch. having done that a bit, I find my self wondering why I didnt get one earlier. I personally havent used the repeat function myself, but one night prior to owning one, i went out storm chasing and I was taking shot after shot using the watch and cheap remote method, the guy I was with had the mc-36 and he had his running the camera with it. it was taking the pix for him. from memory it was 30 second exposures with maybe 10 seconds between them. He was looking around at the storm and scenery, I was looking at my watch and missed the view. I guess in summary I am saying that if you just want a remote for your camera then the cheapy is more than adequate. if you are looking at shooting lots of longer exposures go the mc36 check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Great advice guys - thanks so much. Some food for thought but I will probably end up going with the cheaper one for starters. It seems to be the way all my photography goes. D70 > D200, Sigma 105 macro > Nikon 105 VR, etc
What does Poon call the cheapie? Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
I bought the MC 36 for just this purpose. Well actually taking mini movies of some of the processes building chairs. Then I realised that the D200 has this built in. Stll it is certainly more convenient. I just have it set permanently. I just plug it in and away we go. I use it now and again as a simple cable release, but I sure do miss the D70's wireless remote. One day I may also use it for star trails or storm chasing. I used to do a lot of this in the old days, but haven't since the move to digital. Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|