Tamron 200-500 DI zoom lens vs 400 f5.6 primeModerator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Tamron 200-500 DI zoom lens vs 400 f5.6 primeI'm looking for a telephoto lens around 400-500 mm, am tossing up trying to source a second-hand (or new if still available) Sigma 400 mm f5.6 macro or trying the newish Tamron 200-500 DI zoom. My manual focus 400 mm Sigma (for Canon unfortunately) has always produced sharper shots than the 80-400 Tokina (for Nikon AF) at 400 mm so if anyone here has any experience with the new Tamron vs Sigma prime lens I'd like to hear it.
Regards Horst
Horst,
Dont know much about the lenses that you have listed above, but sinse not one has helped you yet, I'll give it a go. What is your budget BTW? There are plenty of used camera shops in Singapore have you tried bringing your camera to the the following places and taking a few test shots with the above mention lenses? JOHN 3:16 PHOTO SUPPLIES 109 North Bridge Road Funan The IT Mall #03-37 Singapore 179097 Tel: 63372877 Fax: 63371897 Cathay Photo Store (Pte) Ltd 111 North Bridge Rd #01-11/14 Tel : 6337 4274
Thanks for the info. I've more or less given up on the Tamron zoom lens (but may have to revisit if I can't find the Sigma), and I've been scouring Singapore looking for the 400 mm Sigma 5.6 APO Macro prime lens. This has been discontinued and no one here seems to have stock of it. It's a shame Nikon don't make the 400 mm lens with AF/Macro. Regards Horst
Agreed... and this is something Glen was talking about with me over the weekend when I was playing with the Tamron 90mm Macro.
From what I understand, if you're buying it for Macro you should just bet a lens that is really made for the Macro feature like the 90mm. I imagine that lenses like the 400mm or even some of the 70-300mm with Macro just really wouldn't utilise Macro to a really useful extent. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Thanks guys, I want to use it mainly for wildlife pics, so the macro feature is just a bonus as far as I'm concerned. The main reason I would like this lens is that it's very sharp (from reviews), quite light and small, so you can handhold it if need be and you don't need to check it in as a golf bag when travelling. I also have its predessor in a manual focus version with a Canon mount and really like it (unfortunately I haven't come across any sites that offer a conversion ring for using Canon lenses on a Nikon camera, unlike the reverse). Regards Horst
Horst, why don't you try a small repair shop to get not a conversion but a new mount ie take off the Canon mount and replace with a Nikon one. This would involve changing the end but I would imagine it is possible, like changing a f mount to AIS or adding the P to an AIS lens. That is unless you still have the Canon, and even if you do the D70 is probably your primary camera now, so adapt the lens to it
yes get your cannon lenses modified and then buy a bellows to get better magfication. i bet you'll start have fun with that, hehe
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
horstflotow,
Sigma 300-800 is one of the nicer lenses too! You can capture the sails of the Opera House with it from Singapore to Sydney without a TC. Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Or the Sigma 70-200mm plus the 2x Sigma converter - works well and takes you within the range you require and not too much cost
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|