Bugger the rulesModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Bugger the rulesRule of thirds, leading lines, lead into not out of frame, avoid distortion in architecture... There are photography "rules" in abundance.
Sometimes though the rules NEED to be broken. While on my recent NZ visit I returned to Christ Church Cathedral (in Christchurch ). This is a fantastic building if you like that grand style of architecture and it's just had completely new lighting installed. By luck they were testing all the lighting the day I was there so they had the entire set of lights on at different times. So I gave my fisheye a workout. Herewith my rule breaking distorted architecture (of course some rules just HAVE to stay, like symmetry ) Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Sorry, I can't critique it, but I have to say that it looks super awesome!
I especially like the first one where all the arch bases all end on the sides and corners of the frame... what a way to see it all! ---
Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash Wish list: skill
Good for you Peter - rules were not meant to be followed when justifying your right to view and capture excellent pics such as these
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
The first image is superb. Like some shell backed monster before your eye resolves detail and gains recognition. What about cropping off a cm at the base to match the pillars at the top of the image?
In the end we know Nothing, but in the meantime Learn like crazy.
Your Camera Does Matter Nikon D70 D200 D300 PPOK
Ah but Peter,
you forget that these adhere to the Stubbsy Church rule, ie when in a church, use a fish eye lens on the ceiling First one for me, very well done. I always enjoy your church photos like these ones, Cheers, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
There are rules in photography.... !! *inset shocked smiley here*
Seriously though.. really good images here.. they make me dizzy but I love em.. The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
Lovely work Peter, I particularly like the second as the inclusion of the altar places the image.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
The first one has provided some great patterns, my pick out of the series.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|