Available light portraits

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Available light portraits

Postby dawesy on Sun Nov 18, 2007 10:10 pm

Taken on the balcony at home in the last of the direct light from the evening sun. With my girlfriend as a (reaonably) willing model I was able to shoot off a few quick ones before we had to go out to dinner. Unfortunately by the time I got out there the sun was all but gone so to get her in the light meant the average background, though I could have shot up to get sky thinking about it now. Hoping to do a reshoot a bit earlier in the evening and should be able to have some greenery as a background or even a cityish view.

I had hoped to have less shadow, certainly not as dark as this, but I like the result. Would be interested to hear what others think.


Image

Image
dawesy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Roseville, Sydney

Postby Geoff on Sun Nov 18, 2007 10:26 pm

Dawesy - absolutely love the 1st one, that 'golden' hour certainly is magical isn't it? The 2nd one I don't like the strong shadows over the left side of her face. Nice stuff though!
The look on her face in the 1st is awesome, cheeky, inquisitive and happy all in one...u both did well.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun Nov 18, 2007 10:54 pm

#1 Is the winner out of this set

#2 Could of used a reflector, some foamcore to fill in the shadowy side a little

You should do this more often.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Katie G on Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:02 pm

Great pics Jon - love the first one, Luce should be very happy with it!
post some more :cheers:
User avatar
Katie G
Newbie
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:22 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney

Postby dawesy on Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:31 am

Thanks guys. I prefer #1 as well, the photographer in me just doesn't like the contrast between the bright and shadow on her face in #2 though I like the pose. Having said that, she prefers the second!

I have a couple of other ones similar to #1, but that was the best of them. Have some studio lights arriving today so should be plenty more from me soon!
dawesy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Roseville, Sydney

Postby PiroStitch on Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:25 am

The first one is much better but could benefit from a reflector on the right to help ease the the light falloff a bit as it does get harsh pretty quickly. Also tone down the exposure by about a 1/3 of a stop as the left side is a bit bright - not blown - just a bit too bright.

Cool down the colour cast a bit and you have a winner :)
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Steffen on Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:23 pm

dawesy wrote:Having said that, she prefers the second!


I prefer the second one, too. It is technically inferior to the first one, but far more intense and personal.

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby dawesy on Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:09 pm

Thanks for the feedback guys. PiroStich, took your advice, to the letter in fact, and you are spot on. Thanks!

Interestingly, shot this with daylight white balance on the camera, but photoshop had it set warmer than it's idea of daylight. Will have to look into why that is.

Image
dawesy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Roseville, Sydney

Postby PiroStitch on Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:00 am

Much better mate! Great stuff.

Did you bring it in as a Raw file in pshop? Might be the way pshop interprets the WB or your colour profile. I noticed that as well with my files but no big deal in terms of slight corrections.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Dargan on Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:16 am

Hey that is Mona Lisa stuff. Congrats on the pic and the model

edit: Just noticed Leichardt location. Far from Stanley St? My mum is there, if the afternoon light is like that in Sydney now, I better hop a plane!!
In the end we know Nothing, but in the meantime Learn like crazy.
Your Camera Does Matter Nikon D70 D200 D300
PPOK
User avatar
Dargan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 702
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:22 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Postby dawesy on Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:56 am

PiroStitch wrote:Much better mate! Great stuff.

Did you bring it in as a Raw file in pshop? Might be the way pshop interprets the WB or your colour profile. I noticed that as well with my files but no big deal in terms of slight corrections.


Sure did. I specifically set the camera to daylight beforehand and didn't check when I converted it until after you mentioned it. I expected PS to notice the camera WB, though it may just be that they have different Daylight points. Will have to see if it is consistent though so I can be aware of it for future shoots.

Dargan wrote:Hey that is Mona Lisa stuff. Congrats on the pic and the model

edit: Just noticed Leichardt location. Far from Stanley St? My mum is there, if the afternoon light is like that in Sydney now, I better hop a plane!!


Thanks! I was pretty happy with it for a quick shoot, and it helps to have a gorgeous subject.

We're a couple of blocks back from Norton street going away from Balmain road, being on the 4th floor helps with catching the evening light. Not so much fun moving the fridge and the couch in though!
dawesy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Roseville, Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Tue Nov 20, 2007 9:24 pm

The last image you posted has some nice features but I think a little more sympathetic processing would improve it. The red in her eyes should be removed and her eyes brightened a little. The shadow off her nose is distracting and could have been avoided using a sheet of white cardboard as a reflector to bounce a little light back into the shadows. Reflectors are most under utilised by still photographers but are a simple way to vastly improve lighting. Very good but not perfect! :D :D
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby dawesy on Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:06 pm

Matt. K wrote:The last image you posted has some nice features but I think a little more sympathetic processing would improve it. The red in her eyes should be removed and her eyes brightened a little. The shadow off her nose is distracting and could have been avoided using a sheet of white cardboard as a reflector to bounce a little light back into the shadows. Reflectors are most under utilised by still photographers but are a simple way to vastly improve lighting. Very good but not perfect! :D :D


Totally agree about the reflector, it was a spur of the moment thing and next time i'll eithe use one or position her facing the sun more - probably both to see what works best.

As for the processing, aside from the exposure and WB change Piro suggested this is straight out of the camera. I'm not much of a PPer. Perhaps I'll bring this shot to the PP session currently in planning!
dawesy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Roseville, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques