Sea DragonModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Sea DragonTaken under Flinders Pier with my wide angle kit (10.5mm) Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Excellent shot although it looks as if it could do with a little more contrast (in the greens)
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Steve,
Great shot with lots of detail. It looks like you white balance is out as you have lost a lot of colour from the dragon. It is good you have included his eggs, but would have been better if all the tail was included. It also looks like you have pretty good viz, although with a 10.5mm lens, you would have been pretty close.
Always an amazing creature to look at. Nice imagery.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Wow that is clear for flinders! Nice shot. I hope you didnt stalk him too much, sea dragons tend to stress very easily!
Ant. D90 | D50 | Tamron 17-50 2.8| AF-S 18-55 DX (and VR) | Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600
I was in the water! Swimming with the fishes. Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Agreed
Visability was awesome, subject would have been about 5-10cm off the front of the dome. You have to get super close with this lens! Positioning of the strobe is a challenge Ant - I saw three dragons on the dive (2 with eggs) and I photographed them all - but I never touched them and made sure not too many shots on any one fish. It was a good day (and not bad for my first time with this kit). More shots soon. Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|