something for blacknstormyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
something for blacknstormyHey Rel, and everyone else,
I do not have appropriate literature for this fellow. Not a plant! Any ideas? I know his Order but that is about it. Regards Colin Oh yeah, and some critique on the macro too please people. It looks a little soft to me.
I'm no Rel, but at a guess maybe this is Hypodoxa muscosaria (Family Geometridae, Subfamily Geometrinae).
The CSIRO have a good moth gallery but it's pretty extensive (lucky there's not much on TV tonight), this is the photo they have of H. muscosaria: http://www.ento.csiro.au/gallery/moths/ ... muscosaria (edit: note that this is probably a photo of a pinned specimen so wings are not in the natural position) Other web photos have shown it with the more greenish/blue colours, not as vibrant as your photo but that can be a cause of many things. Take a look at the following: http://www.geocities.com/peterslepis/peterm05.jpg http://www.geocities.com/brisbane_loope ... erMoth.htm But wait 'til Rel sees this, she should be able to give you a better idea.
What a showpony! This is why we take macro shots. There is little chance we could appreciate the beauty of these insects without such images. Soft, Smoft.... we are too obsessed by this at times. The colours alone are worth the image. Lovely capture.
In the end we know Nothing, but in the meantime Learn like crazy.
Your Camera Does Matter Nikon D70 D200 D300 PPOK
It's a moth, and a damn pretty one.
Is that Bulbo globuliforme that it is looking at? With the first shot it may have been good to try an off camera flash to try and reduce the flash back and reflection. He (she?) sure looks flash, shiny and reflective and side(?) flash may have created sparkle with out the fairly reflective bit on the left. Stunning. Is the second shot a crop in of the right wing near his body of the first one, sure is great detail. Kind of busy though, but that is moths fault not yours! I would say a little soft and just a little hard to focus the eyes and grasp all the detail, and the back ground (which alone has great texture) takes away from your friend, but he made the choice to be there! Great capture, was this at home? Regards Waz
Thanks Ladybird I will have to remember that site. When is there anything much on telly?
Hey Wazza, It is indeed one of my little Bulbo's at home on cork. The second is a 100% crop out of another pic. I did take a couple. The only flash I have for off camera work would be the ring flash. It is not as powerful as I would like though. Yeah Zaphra I think Ladybird nailed it too. Thanks all, Regards Colin
oops - sorry, I'd missed it - and it looks like you guys are on the mark for the id too
Great shot - they are gorgeous aren't they? Anyone who says that moths are boring haven't really looked at one !!! Well done class Hugs Rel Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|