Last Hillclimb for the year...Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Last Hillclimb for the year...
Brett, I think these are too cluttered for my taste, but I can see what you're trying to do. The Vee in #1 is good, but the foreground is a bit distracting, especially the big tree trunk in front of the car. #2 is good but again the pole just to the right of the main subject is a bit distracting. The official and lights are ok. #3 is great but the main focal point of the image is the driver's helmet/face and it's right down the bottom of the shot, with a lot of wasted space above the car. Would like to see him further up in the frame. #4 is like Where's Wally, except I'm hunting for some action in the form of a car.
I think the thing with most of these is that you're after car + landscape, but if you take the car out of the shot you're left with a very awkwardly composed landscape shot. #7 is the pick of the lot IMHO, love this one!
hi mate,
I agree with Jeff that they are a bit cluttered. 1. I like the concept, it gives a good sensation of speed to get foreground and background in panning shots, but agree the tree detracts from it. Is the full sized image sharp enough to crop to the car only? Great colours though! 3. Nice. I would be tempted to select the drivers face and helmet and add some brightness to them, maybe a little USM also. Would be a good image for the driver to purchase! 5. I like this concept. Maybe tighten the crop a little more, and cut away some of the armco. 6. I would crop this one tighter also, with the 'mt cotton ill climb' sign either the very top of the image, or JUST inside the crop. I also like this idea, I wonder what you could do with this with a tripod? Nice to see some experimentation. I try it occasionally, but have more faith in my ability to get good shots being 'boring'. Well done. 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
#4 works a treat in my opinion
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|