dawn broadwater

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

dawn broadwater

Postby Big Red on Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:59 am

went to bed early [at 10PM] for me and naturally enough i woke at 2.30am...
since i was up i decided to go down the waterfront at first light and try and get a flash shot of an old boat with the sunrise in the background.

Problem was the sunrise was way off to the right almost in line with the waters edge so i missed the better colours.
"sunken dawn"...
Image

i did manage to get out on an old unused boat ramp as the tide was low and grabbed this shot at F2.8 so the flash would paint a smidgeon of light on the moored boat.
"broadwater dawn"...
Image
User avatar
Big Red
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2520
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Jacobs Well Qld ... mossie capital of the world

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:04 am

Shane - both shots are great but #2 is ”feckin” awesome or in non expletive language - WOW!
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Manta on Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:13 am

Great stuff Shane. 2nd is the pic. Perhaps you could try a gradient filter at the bottom of that shot to darken the area on the water the flash has illuminated?
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby Pa on Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:17 am

that's soooo pretty....
cheers pa

http://pa.smugmug.com

Work it's part of your life.....So make it an enjoyable part of it.
User avatar
Pa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: old bar, NSW 2430

Postby Big Red on Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:30 am

sirhc55 wrote:Shane - both shots are great but #2 is ”feckin” awesome or in non expletive language - WOW!


thanks Chris :D
User avatar
Big Red
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2520
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Jacobs Well Qld ... mossie capital of the world

Postby Big Red on Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:31 am

Manta wrote:Great stuff Shane. 2nd is the pic. Perhaps you could try a gradient filter at the bottom of that shot to darken the area on the water the flash has illuminated?


i tried to darken it but it looked false so i cropped it...
Image
User avatar
Big Red
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2520
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Jacobs Well Qld ... mossie capital of the world

Postby Big Red on Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:31 am

Pa wrote:that's soooo pretty....


thanks Pa ... just like me :lol:
User avatar
Big Red
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2520
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Jacobs Well Qld ... mossie capital of the world

Postby Manta on Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:34 am

The crop works. :wink:
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby johnd on Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:03 am

The 2nd is a fantastic shot Shane. And I think the cropping works better than the original. It gets rid of the flash effect at the bottom, but even if the flash effect hadn't been there, the crop works better in my opinion with the horizon on the 1/3.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Big Red on Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:12 pm

johnd wrote:The 2nd is a fantastic shot Shane. And I think the cropping works better than the original. It gets rid of the flash effect at the bottom, but even if the flash effect hadn't been there, the crop works better in my opinion with the horizon on the 1/3.

Cheers
John


agreed the crop look better but i would have liked just slightly less crop.
User avatar
Big Red
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2520
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Jacobs Well Qld ... mossie capital of the world

Postby mattyjacobs on Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:40 pm

personally, the lit up boat doesn't do it for me, i'm finding it a little bit distracting from the awesome colours and texture you've caught in the clouds.
User avatar
mattyjacobs
Member
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 2:54 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby Steffen on Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:39 am

Ok, I'm not sure how to say this, but I'll try anyway...

First off, I prefer the #1 image. It's got a nice rage of tones and really good composition. I just liked when I saw it.

Number 2, the most gorgeous of sunsets, has been spoiled during PP I reckon. I find the overall contrast nice and well chosen. However, the image lacks in mid-range contrast. It almost looks posterised, because the mid contrast is so steep. I like my sunset clouds delicate and fluffy and full of gradations.

I guess I took notice merely because I've recently taken issue with my own choice of over-steepening mid-contrast in a lot of my shots.

If you can find the time of re-PPing the sunset shot with reduced mid-contrast, I'd love to see the result. Take this for what it's worth from a rank amateur...

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby gstark on Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:39 am

Shane,

The crop works, and yes, I agree that you may have cropped just a bit too much.

Here's a question for you: you mention that you used flash to help illuminate the boat. Do you believe that this is what happened? How far away was the boat, and what flash? I'm not criticising here; I'm merely wondering as to whether that actually occurred. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Big Red on Fri Dec 07, 2007 12:59 pm

gstark wrote:Shane,

The crop works, and yes, I agree that you may have cropped just a bit too much.

Here's a question for you: you mention that you used flash to help illuminate the boat. Do you believe that this is what happened? How far away was the boat, and what flash? I'm not criticising here; I'm merely wondering as to whether that actually occurred. :)


I took a pic without the flash but it looked neither here nor there [it just made you look to see what was there and was annoying] so i bumped the aperture up to 2.8 and it lit up enough to see it clearly.

i use the Pentax AF540 FGZ flash which has a guide number of 54 i think.

i was using 16mm on the DA*16-50/2.8 zoom so it was just in range.[20-30 metres ish]
User avatar
Big Red
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2520
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Jacobs Well Qld ... mossie capital of the world

Postby Big Red on Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:12 pm

Steffen wrote:Ok, I'm not sure how to say this, but I'll try anyway...

First off, I prefer the #1 image. It's got a nice rage of tones and really good composition. I just liked when I saw it.

Number 2, the most gorgeous of sunsets, has been spoiled during PP I reckon. I find the overall contrast nice and well chosen. However, the image lacks in mid-range contrast. It almost looks posterised, because the mid contrast is so steep. I like my sunset clouds delicate and fluffy and full of gradations.

I guess I took notice merely because I've recently taken issue with my own choice of over-steepening mid-contrast in a lot of my shots.

If you can find the time of re-PPing the sunset shot with reduced mid-contrast, I'd love to see the result. Take this for what it's worth from a rank amateur...

Cheers
Steffen.


i didn't play with contrast at all, just sat to bring the colour back up from the dull way it opened in RAW. pretty sure that was the only adjustment i made to it apart from resize .

im not sure i know what you mean by mid contrast but your welcome to have a play with the image to show what you mean :D
User avatar
Big Red
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2520
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Jacobs Well Qld ... mossie capital of the world

Postby Geoff M on Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:15 pm

Awesome shot in the 2nd Shane. The crop works better for me.

geoff
User avatar
Geoff M
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.

Postby gstark on Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:22 pm

Big Red wrote:i was using 16mm on the DA*16-50/2.8 zoom so it was just in range.[20-30 metres ish]


Ok, thanx. Sounds like it helped. I was curious, 'cos so often you see people using flash units and you just know it's not going to help.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Oscar on Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:40 pm

The sombre colours, the composition really do it for me - just love the first shot. Well done Shane.

Cheers, Mick :) :) :)
User avatar
Oscar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Panania, Sydney

Postby JeffGlue on Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:44 pm

stunning colours! I look forward to taking some shots like this
JeffGlue
Member
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:04 am
Location: Collinswood, Adelaide


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques