Dee Why in B&W

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Dee Why in B&W

Postby Reschsmooth on Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:08 pm

We took Alex down to Dee Why for a relaxing afternoon (given cricket was washed out). I took a handful of pics with B&W in mind.

I would appreciate any feedback.

Image

Image

Image

I tried to go for a tilt-shift kind of look with this one, but I don't think I got it.

Image

Be as harsh as you want. :D
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby firsty on Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:04 am

the last two really work, with the stark look and great composition of #3 and the great toning (Glow) of #4
User avatar
firsty
Senior Member
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:34 am
Location: Baulkham Hills Sydney - D200

Postby marcotrov on Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:01 pm

Lovely conversions Patrick. #3 and 4 work well. IMHO a little darkening on the three other corners and a lightening of the bolt head at about 3 o'clock on #2 and its an interesting image too :)
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:49 am

Thanks guys.

Keith, I was waiting for ages, with a tired and hungry 6 month old to consider, for these two young girls to get out of the pool. Firstly, I didn't want to be seen taking a photo of two young girls in a pool, and secondly, I didn't want to take a photo of the pool with two young girls in it.

Marco - I agree with your comments on the "thing".
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby PiroStitch on Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:21 am

1st and 3rd ones are great! 1st one just needs to have the vertical and horizons levelled though.

Love the high contrast and simplistic result that you've achieved with the 3rd.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Geoff on Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:40 am

Patrick,
I really think the stand out image in this series is the 3rd one..I think it would look great on canvas. Care to share your conversion/PP moves?
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:51 am

Wayne, at first I thought I had straightened the first one (vertically), but remeasuring I find it is not straight.

Geoff, I think I used the channel mixer for conversion, setting the Red to about -50, Green (middle slider?) to about 180 and Blue (bottom slider) to about -30. (Hard to recall). I then used curves to bump contrast - I was aiming for a close to white wall, although didn't quite get it.

Thanks for the comments.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques