One cock - three takes

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

One cock - three takes

Postby stubbsy on Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:00 pm

This is one of those conundrums that faces me from time to time. I have a subject that appeals and various compositional takes on it and love each. While at Featherdale Wildlife Park today the peacocks were proudly performing for the peahens. This fellow was particular good as a subject and now I can't make a firm choice on which one gets the gong :wink:

Image


Image


Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Underload on Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:09 pm

Peter, the last one (IMHO) is the best of the lot. It looks brilliant!
D200 + stuff
User avatar
Underload
Member
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 12:32 am
Location: Brisbane Northside

Postby rflower on Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:10 pm

I like the brighter colours in 1 (but would like to see more of the bird),
I like the full layout of feathers in 2 (but the feathers seem duller).

Can you get the colours of 1 in the feathers of 2?
Russell
Nikon D700 // 50 1.4 // 70-200 2.8 VRII // 24-120 f4// Tamron 90 // SB-800 // 70-300G
I'm on Redbubble too ... http://www.redbubble.com/people/rflower
If you can make one of my photos look better and you have the inclination ... please do so.
User avatar
rflower
Member
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:01 am
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:10 pm

i love the first.....all three are brilliant though :)
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby Marvin on Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:02 pm

Well, being the adventurous girl I am, I thought I would open this post, only to be sadly disappointed! :wink:
Nikon D7000
User avatar
Marvin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Back in the hot Riverland, SA.

Postby SteveGriffin on Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:21 pm

Peter I think what you want is the last one without his feet partially amputated. :shock:

Try cropping a little off the bottom and sides of the first. :idea:

The second has to many distractions in the background for me. :cry:

Beautiful display he put on for you! :D
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
So many things to do - so little time.
User avatar
SteveGriffin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 815
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Rochedale Brisbane

Postby sirhc55 on Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:29 pm

#1
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Matt. K on Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:37 pm

#2 is best.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby aussichef on Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:23 am

All 3 are great but my favorite is #2
warren aka aussichef
Nikon D50/D80 Nikon,MB-D80 70-200 2.8 VR,Sigma 18-50 2.8, Kenko 1.4x TC, 2 kit lenses ,Nikon 50mm f1.8 Nikon SB-600 Tamron 90mm 2.8 Canon 500D closeup lens
aussichef
Member
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 9:00 am
Location: Port Vincent , and Tanunda South Australia,Australia

Postby Handlebars on Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:05 am

I like #3...I can see more of the base of the tail, and the neck/head plumage of the bird.
C&C more than welcome!
Canon 300d...(hopefully not for too long though)
http://www.redbubble.com/people/HandleBars
User avatar
Handlebars
Member
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:34 am
Location: Wattle Grove, Perth

Postby wazonthehill2 on Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:56 am

No.3 for me
I like the profile of his body and head gear.
Front on in 1 and 2 his face just looks ~weird~
Great colur.
Cheers
Waz
User avatar
wazonthehill2
Member
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Valentine Newcastle NSW Australia

Postby robert on Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:19 am

#3 for me- if you let your eyes go out of focus a bit it is quite mesmerising!
Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
User avatar
robert
Member
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:16 pm
Location: Sutherland, Sydney

Postby PiroStitch on Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:22 am

the first is great. Even consider a tighter crop with no ground so all you see is the head and the patterns of the tail feathers.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby ozimax on Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:27 am

#2 for me, great crop and spectacular colour. Boy, aren't they noisy blighters!
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby BullcreekBob on Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:43 pm

G'day

No 1 for me thanks. And probably a tighter crop with less or no ground, perhaps even a pano type crop.

I guess we all see things differently, my world never looks like a wide angled shot. I'm not the sort of person that sees beauty in a wide vista. I need to break things down into small chunks and focus on details within those small chunks.
Cheers

Bob in sunny Perth
What gear? Watch this space!
User avatar
BullcreekBob
Member
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: Manning - an inner southern suburb of Perth, WA

Postby hyperhiryu on Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:27 pm

Nice cock :lol:

#3 for me; vibrant colors - amazing!
hyperhiryu
Newbie
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:31 am
Location: Melbourne/Sydney

Postby marc on Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:50 pm

#3 is the keeper :wink:
The side/head profile makes it.
D4|D3S|D700+MB-D10| 14-24 |24-70|70-200 f/2.8 VRII|70-200 f/4 VR|80-400 AF-S|500VR|Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro|TC's 1.4,1.7E & 2.0III|SB 900
User avatar
marc
Member
 
Posts: 484
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:20 pm
Location: Laufen, Switzerland. D4, D3S, D700+MB-D10

Postby Bandit on Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:21 pm

I keep looking at #2 for the Magic Eye type effect!!!

#3 for me is the pick of the flock
Jamie

All those who believe in telekinesis, raise my hand.
User avatar
Bandit
Member
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 5:14 pm
Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Postby pippin88 on Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:01 pm

All are superb.

I'd like to see a more OOF background in #2.
- Nick
Gallery
User avatar
pippin88
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Newcastle / Sydney

Postby jethro on Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:11 pm

Pete these are three very big and colourful cocks!
What more can i say
jethro
shoot it real.

look! and see. Shoot and feel
User avatar
jethro
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1006
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: down south, sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques