Wedding shots for Critique

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Wedding shots for Critique

Postby W00DY on Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:19 pm

Hi All,

These were taken at my cousins wedding. I was just a guest and made sure I kept right out of the pro's way. Would love your thoughts.

#1
Image


#2
Image


#3
Image


:D
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Postby scottvd on Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:14 am

So the title under my name is "newbie" - I feel like a special ed kid critiquing a PhD on his quantum-physics lecture.. That being said here's my unwarranted, I've owned a DSLR for two whole months now, never taken a wedding photo in my life before, opinions.. (:

#1 is my favorite but think a bit of fill light would be more flattering.

#2 background is a bit pronounced, and although I don't know what would do it (contrast, or something?) the dress could be a bit whiter - looks a bit too blended in tone with her flesh (unlike #1).

#3 crop is too narrow for me - too much headroom - I think the bystanders are needed to more appropriately set the scene and wouldn't be distracting. Perhaps groom could be dodged a bit..

HA.. I *so* don't know what I'm talking about but that was fun!

~(:

`S
scottvd
Member
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:20 am
Location: Escalon, CA

Postby PiroStitch on Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:44 am

Exposure wise, all 3 are great. I think #2 would benefit from a bit more contrast by adjusting the levels so the couple stands out a bit more but not too much.

Did you take successive shots of #3? The only thing about it is the bride's expression. It's candid, maybe cute but she might be a bit upset about her upturned nose. It's out of your control but usually when someone is walking or laughing, I try to take multiple shots to make the candid shots more pleasing as well.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby W00DY on Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:35 am

scottvd wrote:
#1 is my favorite but think a bit of fill light would be more flattering.



This is one of my favourites as well, I love her expression

scottvd wrote:
#2 background is a bit pronounced, and although I don't know what would do it (contrast, or something?) the dress could be a bit whiter - looks a bit too blended in tone with her flesh (unlike #1).



I'll try a few things and see what happens. I actually desaturated this and then applied a very light red hue to it, that woudl explain the white dress issue. Maybe the tinging doesn't work?

scottvd wrote:
#3 crop is too narrow for me - too much headroom - I think the bystanders are needed to more appropriately set the scene and wouldn't be distracting. Perhaps groom could be dodged a bit..



I know... problem is there was a tripod setup in the aisle and as I was also sitting (and only had the one lens) I didn't have much choice but to get the tripod legs in, so I cropped them out :lol: and yes, the grooms head is a little blown on top!!!

Thanks for the comments Scott, much appreciated.
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Postby W00DY on Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:42 am

PiroStitch wrote:
Exposure wise, all 3 are great.



Thanks, I love the S5 :D

PiroStitch wrote:
I think #2 would benefit from a bit more contrast by adjusting the levels so the couple stands out a bit more but not too much.



I'll give this a go and post the results

PiroStitch wrote:
Did you take successive shots of #3? The only thing about it is the bride's expression. It's candid, maybe cute but she might be a bit upset about her upturned nose. It's out of your control but usually when someone is walking or laughing, I try to take multiple shots to make the candid shots more pleasing as well.


Yeah, I see your point. As mentioned I was in a difficult position with this one. I did take a few more but they were not quite as good as this one (I felt). Luckily the bride (my cousin) is used to her little nose and does find it cute :lol:

Thanks for the comments mate, appreciate them.

:D
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques

cron