One cock - three takesModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
20 posts
• Page 1 of 1
One cock - three takesThis is one of those conundrums that faces me from time to time. I have a subject that appeals and various compositional takes on it and love each. While at Featherdale Wildlife Park today the peacocks were proudly performing for the peahens. This fellow was particular good as a subject and now I can't make a firm choice on which one gets the gong
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I like the brighter colours in 1 (but would like to see more of the bird),
I like the full layout of feathers in 2 (but the feathers seem duller). Can you get the colours of 1 in the feathers of 2? Russell
Nikon D700 // 50 1.4 // 70-200 2.8 VRII // 24-120 f4// Tamron 90 // SB-800 // 70-300G I'm on Redbubble too ... http://www.redbubble.com/people/rflower If you can make one of my photos look better and you have the inclination ... please do so.
Peter I think what you want is the last one without his feet partially amputated.
Try cropping a little off the bottom and sides of the first. The second has to many distractions in the background for me. Beautiful display he put on for you! Steve
------------------------------------------------------- So many things to do - so little time.
All 3 are great but my favorite is #2
warren aka aussichef Nikon D50/D80 Nikon,MB-D80 70-200 2.8 VR,Sigma 18-50 2.8, Kenko 1.4x TC, 2 kit lenses ,Nikon 50mm f1.8 Nikon SB-600 Tamron 90mm 2.8 Canon 500D closeup lens
I like #3...I can see more of the base of the tail, and the neck/head plumage of the bird.
C&C more than welcome!
Canon 300d...(hopefully not for too long though) http://www.redbubble.com/people/HandleBars
No.3 for me
I like the profile of his body and head gear. Front on in 1 and 2 his face just looks ~weird~ Great colur. Cheers Waz
the first is great. Even consider a tighter crop with no ground so all you see is the head and the patterns of the tail feathers.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
#2 for me, great crop and spectacular colour. Boy, aren't they noisy blighters!
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
G'day
No 1 for me thanks. And probably a tighter crop with less or no ground, perhaps even a pano type crop. I guess we all see things differently, my world never looks like a wide angled shot. I'm not the sort of person that sees beauty in a wide vista. I need to break things down into small chunks and focus on details within those small chunks. Cheers
Bob in sunny Perth What gear? Watch this space!
Previous topic • Next topic
20 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|